Hi,
We have a relatively common situation whereby we will create our own product
by deriving off an existing Zope product.
However, the original product is still available through Products.meta_types
and the factory construction mechanism. This is a pain as then users must
be careful as to wh
Evan Simpson wrote:
Until cAccessControl.c is fixed, you can work around the problem with a
simple patch to Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py, in
restrictedTraverse():
if isinstance(name, TupleType):
object = object(*name)
continue
+
+ name = str
Zope 2.6.2, Zeo 2.0.1b1 and python 2.2.3
>I'm trying to get this combo working (I know its not officially
> supported). It works fine except for when a second client updates zeo
> the changes aren't seen from the first client (until its restarted). I
> ran the zeo tests with 2.2.3 and they
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:48:13AM -0400, Erik A.Dahl wrote:
> I'm trying to get this combo working (I know its not officially
> supported). It works fine except for when a second client updates zeo
> the changes aren't seen from the first client (until its restarted). I
> ran the zeo tests wi
Until cAccessControl.c is fixed, you can work around the problem with a
simple patch to Products/PageTemplates/Expressions.py, in
restrictedTraverse():
if isinstance(name, TupleType):
object = object(*name)
continue
+
+ name = str(name)
if
Richard Waid wrote:
Basically, if you're using a ZPT with a content-type text/xml, using a
TAL path expression to access an attribute or method causes a security
violation (Unauthorized). It does not happen if the ZPT is using
content-type text/html.
Ah, guarded_getattr is doing something wrong
I'm trying to get this combo working (I know its not officially
supported). It works fine except for when a second client updates zeo
the changes aren't seen from the first client (until its restarted). I
ran the zeo tests with 2.2.3 and they all pass. Zope 2.6.2 seems to
work fine even with
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 16:13:55 -0400
Casey Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 19 September 2003 04:31 am, Andre Schubert wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:32:52 +0200
> > Andre Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > i have a little problem.
> > > We have sever
