In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> As I mentioned in another message, old Zope 2 databases won't work on the
> head for a while until I have a chance to come up with a mechanism for
> converting ancient BTrees and intSets.
Could you define "ancient"? Since what version have "recent" BTree
Jim Fulton wrote:
Hi,
I'm just about to start writing the checkin logs for the merge of new-style
ExtensionClass and ZODB 3.3 into the Zope 2 head. I expect the merge to
be done within the next hour or two.
Done!
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 09:59, Jim Fulton wrote:
Hi,
I'm just about to start writing the checkin logs for the merge of new-style
ExtensionClass and ZODB 3.3 into the Zope 3 head. I expect the merge to be done
within the next hour or two.
You mean the Zope 2 HEAD, correct?
O
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 09:59, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just about to start writing the checkin logs for the merge of new-style
> ExtensionClass and ZODB 3.3 into the Zope 3 head. I expect the merge to be done
> within the next hour or two.
You mean the Zope 2 HEAD, correct?
_
Hi,
I'm just about to start writing the checkin logs for the merge of new-style
ExtensionClass and ZODB 3.3 into the Zope 3 head. I expect the merge to be done
within the next hour or two.
Except for a test failure and some warnings pre-existing on the head, all of the
tests and Zope runs. This i
Jim Fulton wrote:
Zope 2.8 will not include the old BTree or intSet objects. I plan to
arrange for this not to be a problem for old databases. Somehow, Zope 2.8
will convert these automatically. I haven't done this yet though.
I'd like to merge the new-style ExtensionClass and ZODB 3.3 work soon.
> I have never seen disappearing sessions -- but I must admit
> that we use our own session implementation - deriving from
> Zope's session but getting rid of the over-complex session
> management code.
I've not explained very well. Session object doesn't disappears, just
some data in session obj
