Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 18:30, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> > Its desirable in some circumstances, but not all. Part of the problem
> > is people tend to blindly follow the traditional approach to daemon
> > design without bothering to actually do any critical thinking.
>
> I exp
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 18:30, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> Its desirable in some circumstances, but not all. Part of the problem
> is people tend to blindly follow the traditional approach to daemon
> design without bothering to actually do any critical thinking.
I expect you don't intend to sound rud
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> You should take it up with the sysadmin on the zodb-dev list who wanted
> this feature :-).
They already had it, they just need to learn how to take advantage of
the environment they're working in.
> Daemons don't set the umask by themselves; they only do it when a
> sysadm
Jim Fulton wrote at 2004-1-16 18:54 -0500:
> ...
>> For security checks, the accessed object should be the driving factor
>> and not the particular way the access is made.
>
>Well, sorry, that's not what this is about. We are talking about what
>to do when accessing objects without roles. The
Jeremy Hylton wrote at 2004-1-16 16:53 -0500:
> ...
>The branch tag is used for making releases for both ZODB and Zope
>releases. We decided to use the same branch so that we didn't have to
>port bug fixes to so many different branches.
>
>One downside of that merge, which we didn't realized until
Fábio Bruno wrote:
Dear Sir or Madame I'm wrigting because I started to do a plone site
in zope.I would lke to know if I can change the url and/or port where
the plone site stays.I would like to know how to chenge this path
http:\\localhost:8080\Plone.
You need a VirtualHostMonster and possibl
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 17:22, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> > I committed a patch with the umask option a few days ago. I thought it
> > only affected zdaemon and the tests all looked clean afterwards. I'm
> > not sure how zopectl.py ends up being affected or why there aren't any
>
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> I committed a patch with the umask option a few days ago. I thought it
> only affected zdaemon and the tests all looked clean afterwards. I'm
> not sure how zopectl.py ends up being affected or why there aren't any
> tests of it. The various scripts to start and stop progr
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 16:58, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> (sidebar, the zopectl error is:
> $ /var/zope/bin/zopectl start
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/opt/Zope-2.8/lib/python/Zope/Startup/zopectl.py", line 207, in ?
> main()
> File "/opt/Zope-2.8/lib/python/Zope/Startup/zopectl.
I forgot to check event.log, that gives information about the problem.
Thanks.
2004-01-17T17:07:23 PROBLEM(100) ZODB FS FS21 warn: Ignoring
index for /var/zope/var/Data.fs
--
2004-01-17T17:07:24 INFO(0) Zope Ready to handle requests
--
2004-01-17T17:07:48 PROBLEM(100) Zope Security Policy
This error popped up in the nightly tests as well. I haven't spent any
time tracking it down.
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 16:58, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing this with a fresh checkout of CVS head
> (linux, py2.3.2, 2004-01-17 16:40 EST)? When adding any object from the
> ZMI, I get th
Is anyone else seeing this with a fresh checkout of CVS head
(linux, py2.3.2, 2004-01-17 16:40 EST)? When adding any object from the
ZMI, I get the same error. Nothing shows up in Z2.log. I can only start
zope with runzope at the moment, no error message is indicated in that
console when adding.
T
Sorry for creating a mess,
I get the error with and without VerboseSecurity.
The one VerboseSecurity I am using is only a couple of days old from CVS.
I thought this one was allready adapted.
Robert
On Saturday 17 January 2004 16:04, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Gfeller Martin wrote:
> > Dear Jim,
> >
robert wrote:
Hi there,
I have a DCWorkflow (running under plone 1.04) that has bean doing fine now for a year
or so.
Now under 2.7 I get the following traceback:
[...]
Module Products.VerboseSecurity.VerboseSecurityPolicy, line 272, in validate
Please *read* the changelog of Zope 2.7b3 and grep
robert wrote:
Hi there,
I have a DCWorkflow (running under plone 1.04) that has bean doing fine now for a year
or so.
Now under 2.7 I get the following traceback:
thanks for any help
Robert
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 100, in publish
Module ZPublisher.mapply, li
Gfeller Martin wrote:
Dear Jim,
are there already plans when Zope 2.8 should see the light of the day?
Other than soon, no. It depend on resources, including non-ZC contributors,
and problems we encounter.
I've updated the project area at:
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/Zope2.8
i
Now that we've reached closure on some of the outstanding security
issues in Zope there's a lot of stuff in the Collector that needs to
be revisited...
Brian Lloyd wrote:
> - For loops, list comprehensions, and other iterations in untrusted code
> - List and dictionary instance methods in untr
Hi there,
I have a DCWorkflow (running under plone 1.04) that has bean doing fine now for a year
or so.
Now under 2.7 I get the following traceback:
thanks for any help
Robert
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 100, in publish
Module ZPublisher.mapply, line 88, in ma
Bakhtiar,
thanks for your pointer.
unfortunately I can not reach my-zope.org.
And the cvs on sourceforge is 16 months old. Not 2.7 ready I geuess.
I fixed The "missing docstring" problem, but I still can not add a local FS.
As soon as I add a local FS to a directory, that directory becomes unaccess
19 matches
Mail list logo
