On Thursday 26 February 2004 06:50 am, Nikolay Kim wrote:
> is there any way create server for new protocol without changing ZServer
> module?
There's clearly a need for some more documentation here, but I'm not sure what
to write yet, or where it should go.
Contrary to many of the other respo
In this way (with small chunks),
can I do a get_transaction().commit(1)
for commit each chunks or is it unnessecary ?
Thank everybody for your help
> Write a script to do it in smaller chunks - 20 at a time or somethig.
> Keep track of those that succeed, so you can restart where you left off
Casey Duncan wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:47:19 +0100
Eric Brun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes but impossible to update it because it is too big, and the
transaction never finish or abort because of time out.
I don't know how to do this.
Have you a idea for help me ?
You might try using anothe
The old ZODB object cache had a notion of cache age. Objects that
hadn't been accessed within a certain time were removed from the cache.
This feature was removed in Zope 2.6, but all of the APIs that
controlled the age (sometimes called cacheDeactivateAfter) were kept
around.
I'd like to mark a
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:47:19 +0100
Eric Brun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Yes but impossible to update it because it is too big, and the
> transaction never finish or abort because of time out.
>
> I don't know how to do this.
>
> Have you a idea for help me ?
You might try using another
Yes but impossible to update it because it is too big, and the transaction never
finish or abort because of time out.
I don't know how to do this.
Have you a idea for help me ?
> Eric Brun wrote:
>
> > An idea for fix it ?
>
> Have you tried updating the catalog from it's advanced tab?
>
>
Eric Brun wrote:
An idea for fix it ?
Have you tried updating the catalog from it's advanced tab?
Not sure how that'd pan out on 200,000 objects though...
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
