Yvo Schubbe wrote:
> Log message for revision 39903:
> - converted interface to z3 interface.
>
> Changed:
> D Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/IUserFolder.py
I think we should maybe leave the Zope 2 interfaces around for at least
one release. People with custom user folder implementatio
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 12:14 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself.
> >
> >
> > Farce?
>
> We aren't running the real configure.
If you mean autotool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 05.11.2005, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Lennart Regebro:
>
>>On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself.
>>
>>Farce?
>>
>>
>>>I'd be ha
> I wasn't arguing that configure/make was hard to use. I'm arguing
> that it's something extra to maintain and is just silly.
>
> It's main benefit is that it leverages a familiar pattern, but
> I'm not convinced that it's worth it. Also, as tools like rpm and
> deb become more widely used, I'm
On 11/5/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's main benefit is that it leverages a familiar pattern, but
> I'm not convinced that it's worth it. Also, as tools like rpm and
> deb become more widely used, I'm not sure how familar the configure/make
> dance is. Other than Python and Zope,
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 4. November 2005 11:27:10 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most people who download Zope 2 are not Python programmers. Many of them
become Python programmers later. I think this is a big part of Zope 2's
value proposition that we haven't matched in Zope 3
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself.
Farce?
We aren't running the real configure. We aren't really using make.
We're just using make as a wrapper around setup.py.
I'd be happy to
On 11/5/05, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The usual setup.py from distutils to make it more pythonic.
The install.py in the root of the distribution is actually a
conventional setup.py. Would it be helpful to keep the setup.py name?
We renamed it to encourage the configure/make da
Am Samstag, den 05.11.2005, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Lennart Regebro:
> On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself.
>
> Farce?
>
> > I'd be happy to get rid of it. I'm also happy to defer to the vocal
> > majority. Mayb
--On 4. November 2005 11:27:10 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most people who download Zope 2 are not Python programmers. Many of them
become Python programmers later. I think this is a big part of Zope 2's
value proposition that we haven't matched in Zope 3 yet.
Having said that
On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself.
Farce?
> I'd be happy to get rid of it. I'm also happy to defer to the vocal
> majority. Maybe it's worth revisiting this, which is why the provocative
> subject. :)
I rea
Am Freitag, den 04.11.2005, 08:42 +0700 schrieb Thanh Hải, Hà:
> 2005/11/3, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No it is not. And doing that opens up security risks. You need
> to
> write a Python product or external method.
>
> jens
>
>
> Is
12 matches
Mail list logo
