Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-3-24 19:32 +0100:
> ...
>> I am also very interested in versions, and maintaining versions.
>
>I think versions are history and have gone in Zope 2.8 or even Zope 2.7.
"FileStorage" still supports them -- thus it is still easy to
use them in a separate product.
I am not
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-3-25 08:19 +0100:
> ...
>> I am very happy to read this...
>>
>
>I still have no idea why you are behind ZClasses?
It is nice to have an UI supported way to build applications.
ZClasses are in many cases easier than Python based product
development.
> ...
>ZClasses will
On Saturday 25 March 2006 15:56, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Zope 2.7 throws a BadPickleGet, 12 exception, Zope 2.8 throws
> BadPickleGet, 13 and Zope 2.9 raises the described UnicodeDecodeError.
> I don't expect that the import functionality works for even more complex
> objects. So I consider the whole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
> --On 24. März 2006 11:07:06 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> - it was broken multiple times in the past, it still has problems
>>
>> How so?
>
> The import functionality seem to be broken since at least Zope
--On 25. März 2006 13:14:06 -0500 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
FileSystemSite
This is a repackaging of the CMF's FileSystem Directory Views such
that it is independent of the CMF.
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 24. März 2006 16:20:07 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I don't particularly care one way or the other about ZClasses.
>>
>> However, I would like to see FileSystemSite made part of the
>> base distribution.
>>
>
>
--On 24. März 2006 11:07:06 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- it was broken multiple times in the past, it still has problems
How so?
The import functionality seem to be broken since at least Zope 2.7.
I created a DTML method exported it and _tried_ to reimport it.
Zope 2.7
Andreas Jung wrote:
> As announced earlier I plan to release Zope 2.8.7 and 2.9.2 by
> next Monday...so as always: any pending fixes should be commited
> until Monday.
Can we have a Zope 3.2.1 along with Zope 2.9.2? There are a few bugfixes
on the Zope 3.2 branch (e.g. involving widgets, formlib,
+1
I have handed systems with a thin ZClass layer on top to semi-
developers and they were *easily* able to take it from there. These
are people who would never have grokked (and bothered with) disk-
based Python development and all the mumbo-jumbo it entails.
No other system has anything e
