Fred Drake wrote:
(possibly named LLBTree, LOBTree, and OLBTree).
For my half-penny's worth, this is the way I'd like to see it go.
Explicit is better than implicit and all that.
If you need more than 32-bits, you can explicitly use them.
The implicit change to make them all 64-bits which
Hi Alec,
Five traversal is definitely very touchy, and the interactions with Zope
numerous. So I'm sure the problem you observed is real and that a
solution must be found. The unit tests you propose would go a long way
to having a fix committed asap, so yes please, provide one.
Florent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Apr 2006, at 14:15, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
almost all big Zope projects have changed to Subversion
fortunately. Using
svn:externals is a nice way to build bundles and helps a lot
deploying software. However projects still have some
On 4/17/06, Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alec,
Five traversal is definitely very touchy, and the interactions with Zope
numerous. So I'm sure the problem you observed is real and that a
solution must be found. The unit tests you propose would go a long way
to having a fix
Alec Mitchell wrote at 2006-4-16 12:28 -0700:
...
It seems that the way OFS.Traversable.restrictedTraverse() handles
security checking on objects with __bobo_traverse__ methods is
considerably different from the way it normally checks security. The
result is that traversal cannot obtain
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree),
and I'm not the first. I've created a feature
On 4/17/06, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fact that IIBTrees is so widely used is exatly the reason
I want to use 64-bits for the existing types rather than having to
introduce a new type.
Oops, I was checking in the separated version of 64-bit BTrees while
this was landing in my
Fred Drake wrote:
I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree),
and I'm not the first. I've created a feature development branch for
this, and checked in my initial implementation.
I've modified the existing code to use PY_LONG_LONG instead of int for
the key and/or
On 4/17/06, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote at 2006-4-16 12:28 -0700:
...
It seems that the way OFS.Traversable.restrictedTraverse() handles
security checking on objects with __bobo_traverse__ methods is
considerably different from the way it normally checks
