Hi all,
on behalf of Zope developer community I am pleased to announce the release
of Zope 2.10.0.
You can download Zope 2.10.0 from:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.0/
Some new features of Zope 2.10:
- ZPT implementation based on Zope 3
- experimental WSGI and Twisted integrat
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7999
Blamelist:
alga,andreasjung,ctheune,dobe,faassen,fdrake,flox,icemac,jim,jukart,oestermeier,philikon,rafrombrc,romanofski,schwending
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin6.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 7999
Blamelist:
alga,andreasjung,ctheune,dobe,faassen,fdrake,flox,icemac,jim,jukart,oestermeier,philikon,rafrombrc,romanofski,schw
--On 2. Oktober 2006 10:24:33 -0700 Christopher Lozinski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do like the idea of ZClasses as a separate product.
If we make ZClasses a separate product, does that mean we can get our
own mailing list for ZClasses. Maybe a separate web site, wiki, etc?
I doubt
Hi all,
while working on the Zope trunk I figured out that the trunk contains
svn:externals both to Zope 3 tags and Zope 3 branches. This mixture is
insane. I propose the following for the future:
- the svn:externals on the trunk should point to the latest release
branches (Zope 3, ZODB etc.
Previously Andreas Jung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> while working on the Zope trunk I figured out that the trunk contains
> svn:externals both to Zope 3 tags and Zope 3 branches. This mixture is
> insane. I propose the following for the future:
>
> - the svn:externals on the trunk should point to the
On 10/2/06, Christopher Lozinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do like the idea of ZClasses as a separate product.
Actually I think all of Zope should be an assembly of separate products.
I would love to see multiple flavors of Zope each as an assembly of
separate products.
If we make ZClasses
Lennart Regebro said the following on 10/02/2006 11:16 AM:
> On 10/2/06, Olavo Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Many "deprecation sign for any user" are clearly signs that Zope
>> developers are unable to maintain certain Zope features.
>
> No they are not.
Technically that is correct.
On 10/3/06, Dario Lopez-Kästen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lennart Regebro said the following on 10/02/2006 11:16 AM:
> On 10/2/06, Olavo Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Many "deprecation sign for any user" are clearly signs that Zope
>> developers are unable to maintain certain Zope feat
silence == consent. will proceed as declared.
-w
whit wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 06:26:49PM -0500, whit wrote:
It seems like if you've set your PYTHONPATH and start zope, you would
expect that path to be available.
Indeed.
Anyone object to this going forward? Anyo
thanks guys...know this one was a long time in the coming.
-w
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi all,
on behalf of Zope developer community I am pleased to announce the
release of Zope 2.10.0.
You can download Zope 2.10.0 from:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.0/
Some new features of Zope 2.
11 matches
Mail list logo