On 10/9/06, Jean-Marc Orliaguet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's basically what I wrote the other day (The Times... ) : as an
application designer you want a *plugin architecture* with greasy fat
components, not an architecture with hundreds of micro-components wired
together like this:
http://j
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-10-9 19:59 +0200:
> ...
>Sure, you CAN try to
>reuse stuff (and I know some of your tools, e.g. rebindFunction et.al.
>from ReuseUtils), but most of these revolve more around implementation
>details than around well-defined APIs and responsibilities.
This
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-10-9 19:24 +0200:
> ...
>We have some code where some classes have up to 15(!) base classes (usually
>mixin classes), not counting classes inherited from the mix-in classes. I
>would call that unmanageable.
Each of these classes represent a mixed in feature.
You get 15
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 10/9/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-10-7 23:51 +0200:
> ...
>> I find that the introduction of classes with (multiple) inheritance
>> has been very economic. It was another concept but a highly fruitful
>> one, despi
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-10-7 23:51 +0200:
...
I find that the introduction of classes with (multiple) inheritance
has been very economic. It was another concept but a highly fruitful
one, despite the fact that they are not so liked in Zope3 land.
I think "fa
On 10/9/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-10-7 23:51 +0200:
> ...
>> I find that the introduction of classes with (multiple) inheritance
>> has been very economic. It was another concept but a highly fruitful
>> one, despite the fact that they ar
--On 9. Oktober 2006 19:11:55 +0200 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I would not recommend anyone to over-use multiple inheritance as it's
been done in Zope 2.
I am a strong favorite of (multiple) inheritance and use it excessively.
I have the feeling that it makes me very producti
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-10-7 23:51 +0200:
> ...
>> I find that the introduction of classes with (multiple) inheritance
>> has been very economic. It was another concept but a highly fruitful
>> one, despite the fact that they are not so liked in Zope3 land.
>
>I think "fat" objects
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:19:22PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
| You (ZC, ZF, the community) want someone who /uses/ Zope on Windows to make
| Windows releases. It was at best half nuts that I kept doing it after
| building & testing an installer once each N weeks became my only contact
| with Zope.
--On 9. Oktober 2006 12:19:22 -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't know about "should be", but it /is/ related ;-) I had job-related
reasons before to make at least minimal ongoing efforts toward keeping the
Zope test suites happy on Windows, and that in turn meant I kept many fu
[Andreas Jung]
Who is currently in charge or who feels responsible for the Windows
builds?
[Sidnei da Silva]
Tim Peters.
[Chris Withers]
Er, no. Tim isn't even at Zope Corp anymore, as far as I know...
[Sidnei]
That shouldn't be related, should it?
Don't know about "should be", but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6 Oct 2006, at 18:55, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 6 Oct 2006, at 17:38, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I noticed that ZopeVersionControl is still actively maintained in
CVS.
Would its maintainers mind moving it to subversion? That would make
it a lot
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 03:25:55PM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| >On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 09:25:29AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
| >| Who is currently in charge or who feels responsible for the Windows
| >builds?
| >
| >Tim Peters.
|
| Er, no. Tim isn't even at Zope Corp a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miles Waller wrote:
>>
>> I noticed that Tres was making changes in CVS and preparing a 0.3.2
>> release, so there is at least some activity.
>>
>
> That was me ... I badgered Tres into incorporating a patch I'd put into
> the tracker. Before that th
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 09:25:29AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
| Who is currently in charge or who feels responsible for the Windows builds?
Tim Peters.
Er, no. Tim isn't even at Zope Corp anymore, as far as I know...
I built the last couple of Zope 2.9.x release, but my
I noticed that Tres was making changes in CVS and preparing a 0.3.2
release, so there is at least some activity.
That was me ... I badgered Tres into incorporating a patch I'd put into
the tracker. Before that there was no activity.
It definitely doesn't have a maintainer. There are clues
与美女视频聊天直播，按此进入
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/list
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
19 matches
Mail list logo
