On 4/25/07, Christopher Lozinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I would like these schema generators to understand not only specific python
objects, but also the network of python business objects.
[...]
I would like a security model based on business rules.
There is nothing in ZClasses that
On Mar 2, 12:01 pm, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Reinout van Rees wrote:
On Mar 1, 2:50 am, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the DZUG is working on a read-only mirror that will be accessible via
anonymous HTTP.
It will likely be available shortly
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Apr 25 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Thu Apr 26 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Wed Apr 25 20:50:39 EDT 2007
Andreas Jung skrev:
He's trying to reinvent wheels? Reads a bit like GrokNG :-)
And reinventing the wheel is bad?
I believe that pirelli or firestone has a larger market than Zope. And
they do nothing but.
Besides, my car would suck with stone wheels at 100MPH. Well probably
allready at
--On 26. April 2007 14:10:49 +0200 Max M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung skrev:
He's trying to reinvent wheels? Reads a bit like GrokNG :-)
And reinventing the wheel is bad?
It depends on *who* is trying to reinvent wheels :-)
I just have some feeling about the quality of the new
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-4-25 22:13 +0200:
...
But readable and comprehensible magic...but I would not call that magic.
If I see at class level a function call grok.context(something),
this does not look like comprehensible magic.
--
Dieter
___
