On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 20:01 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Roché Compaan wrote at 2007-9-18 08:55 +0200:
> > ...
> >Sorry if I was unclear but what I'm really asking is if it is possible
> >to improve the conflict handling of the current indexes that we have in
> >Zope. I am also asking if concurren
Joachim Schmitz wrote at 2007-9-19 11:54 +0200:
>and
>
>../portal_catalog/getBypassQueue
>displays a 1
This looks like a security bug.
You should not be able to "call" something via the ZPublisher
what you cannot call in a script.
Maybe, you file a bug report?
--
Dieter
_
Laurence Rowe wrote at 2007-9-19 10:03 +0100:
> ...
>Indexes are inherently difficult to perform conflict resolution on. As
>Dieter mentioned their implementation is designed for efficient reading,
>not efficient writing.
You did not mean me?
I have implemented the "Conflict Reduced Indexes" be
Tres Seaver schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
security.declareProtected(view_management_screens, 'getBypassQueue')
def getBypassQueue(self):
"get _by_pass"
if not hasattr(self,"_bypass"):
self._bypass = False
return self._bypass
I would write thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have monkey-patched the QueueCatalog to adopt it to our needs, which
> works fine. I now wanted to introduce a new feature:
>
> The QueueCatalog should be bypassed during mass-import of data.
> So I introduced a ne
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Sep 18 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Sep 19 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Sep 18 20:50:14 EDT 2007
URL
Hi,
I have monkey-patched the QueueCatalog to adopt it to our needs, which
works fine. I now wanted to introduce a new feature:
The QueueCatalog should be bypassed during mass-import of data.
So I introduced a new variable "_bypass", and new getBypassQueue() and
setBypassQueue methods in the
Roché Compaan wrote:
I use QueueCatalog often and I know how it works. But if an application
requires immediate indexing then QueueCatalog is not a solution.
Sorry if I was unclear but what I'm really asking is if it is possible
to improve the conflict handling of the current indexes that we