[Zope-dev] Re: zcml entry points

2007-10-17 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > A common issue we are seeing is that we have eggs depending on each > other, but they still need to load the zcml from those dependencies > somehow. As a temporary solution to play with the concept I added > something simple t

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: zcml entry points

2007-10-17 Thread Fred Drake
On 10/17/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right - but you're building an application, and you're pretty > experienced with Zope. A lot of Plone users just want to install a > plug-in (a product), basically. Before, they just dropped it into a It sounds like your concerns center aroun

[Zope-dev] Re: zcml entry points

2007-10-17 Thread Ross Patterson
Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Fred Drake wrote: >> On 10/17/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The main win, IMHO, is to avoid the requirement for people to install >>> slugs for third party products. Slugs suck - they are confusing to >>> explain and people forget them

[Zope-dev] Re: zcml entry points

2007-10-17 Thread Martin Aspeli
Fred Drake wrote: On 10/17/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The main win, IMHO, is to avoid the requirement for people to install slugs for third party products. Slugs suck - they are confusing to explain and people forget them all the time. Buildout makes it a bit easier, but it's s

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: zcml entry points

2007-10-17 Thread Fred Drake
On 10/17/07, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The main win, IMHO, is to avoid the requirement for people to install > slugs for third party products. Slugs suck - they are confusing to > explain and people forget them all the time. Buildout makes it a bit > easier, but it's still not a te

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Schedule for Zope 2.11

2007-10-17 Thread Amos Latteier
On 10/17/07, Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Amos, > > Are you planning to merge your pytz work to trunk? Done. -Amos ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encodi

[Zope-dev] Re: zcml entry points

2007-10-17 Thread Martin Aspeli
Fred Drake wrote: On 10/17/07, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A common issue we are seeing is that we have eggs depending on each other, but they still need to load the zcml from those dependencies somehow. As a temporary solution to play with the concept I added something simple to

Re: [Zope-dev] zcml entry points

2007-10-17 Thread Fred Drake
On 10/17/07, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A common issue we are seeing is that we have eggs depending on each > other, but they still need to load the zcml from those dependencies > somehow. As a temporary solution to play with the concept I added > something simple to the plone.re

[Zope-dev] zcml entry points

2007-10-17 Thread Wichert Akkerman
A common issue we are seeing is that we have eggs depending on each other, but they still need to load the zcml from those dependencies somehow. As a temporary solution to play with the concept I added something simple to the plone.recipe.zope2instance buildout recipe. It allows you to define entr

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Schedule for Zope 2.11

2007-10-17 Thread Amos Latteier
On 10/17/07, Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you planning to merge your pytz work to trunk? Thanks for giving me a push. I was waiting until I heard whether people wanted it merged. So now that Andreas says he's OK with it, I'll do it. -Amos ___

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2007-10-17 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Oct 16 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Oct 17 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Tue Oct 16 20:53:28 EDT 2007 URL

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Schedule for Zope 2.11

2007-10-17 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 17. Oktober 2007 11:36:04 +0100 Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to see the DateTime pytz work and my datetime comapatibility patch merged as well. (they work fine together). I am +/-0 on this patch. If nobody objects, go ahead and merge it. Andreas pgpuy3KdOhN1h.pgp

[Zope-dev] Re: Schedule for Zope 2.11

2007-10-17 Thread Laurence Rowe
I'd like to see the DateTime pytz work and my datetime comapatibility patch merged as well. (they work fine together). Laurence Andreas Jung wrote: Hi, any probleme with the following schedule for Zope 2.11: beta 1 - end of October RC 1 - around Dec 15th final - end of the year Since I am

Re: [Zope-dev] Schedule for Zope 2.11

2007-10-17 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 17. Oktober 2007 11:26:02 +0200 Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Previously Andreas Jung wrote: Hi, any probleme with the following schedule for Zope 2.11: beta 1 - end of October RC 1 - around Dec 15th final - end of the year Since I am on vacation from Nov 3rd to Dec 5

[Zope-dev] Zope 2.11 release schedule

2007-10-17 Thread Andreas Jung
Hi, any problems with the following schedule for Zope 2.11: beta 1 - end of October RC 1 - around Dec 15th final - end of the year Since I am on vacation from Nov 3rd to Dec 5th, I would be happy if someone could care about a further beta release (if needed) sometime in November. Any takers?

Re: [Zope-dev] Schedule for Zope 2.11

2007-10-17 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Andreas Jung wrote: > Hi, > > any probleme with the following schedule for Zope 2.11: > > beta 1 - end of October > > RC 1 - around Dec 15th > final - end of the year > > Since I am on vacation from Nov 3rd to Dec 5th I would be happy > if someone could care about a further beta rele

[Zope-dev] Schedule for Zope 2.11

2007-10-17 Thread Andreas Jung
Hi, any probleme with the following schedule for Zope 2.11: beta 1 - end of October RC 1 - around Dec 15th final - end of the year Since I am on vacation from Nov 3rd to Dec 5th I would be happy if someone could care about a further beta release (if needed) sometime in November. Any takers? R