Am Samstag, den 20.10.2007, 13:02 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Oct 18
12:00:00 2007 UTC to Fri Oct 19 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5
messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK ---
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Oct 21 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Mon Oct 22 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Oct 21 20:53:47 EDT 2007
Hey,
On 10/20/07, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
Since this appears to be a rare case that is the exception, what about
using the new ZCML exclude framework for this case? You need to know
what you are doing, but this use case is for people who know
Hey,
On 10/20/07, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say it is a general concern of a framework to try to avoid how often
you need to repeat yourself. Right now you to use a Zope 3 package you
need to do the following things:
Hey,
On 10/20/07, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Zope 2 had (for products) all three things together.
It was felt that this was a too tight coupling. Therefore, for Zope 3
the paradigma explicit is better than implicit (a paradigma, that I
personally dislike and find wrong)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
On 10/20/07, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say it is a general concern of a framework to try to avoid how often
you need to repeat yourself. Right
On 10/22/07, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In at least 3 places we express dependency information. For different
*purposes* in each case, but we still state something like:
1. we use dependency X, and please download and install it
2. we use dependency X, please configure it
3. we
Hanno Schlichting wrote at 2007-10-22 09:43 +0200:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
...
I object to this change. HTTPRequest does not really fulfil the
IBrowserRequest interface, and ObjectManager isn't a real IContainer
either. I understand that somebody made a mistake when they declared
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I, too, feel it is wrong
to use implements(...) when the class does not implement
All declarations should be trustable -- otherwise, you could forget
about interfaces alltogether...
On some occasions you just can't fulfill an entire interface, and for
whatever
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 80945:
Moved two implements declarations from Five into the proper classes.
I object to this change. HTTPRequest does not really fulfil the
IBrowserRequest interface, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
