Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The recommendation is still "System python is evil, evil, evil" (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to get their Plone site, it's a nece
Baiju M wrote:
Hi Limi,
Alexander Limi wrote:
Sorry if this has been asked hundreds of times before — I couldn't
find any info on this apart from the Summer of Code project related
to Zope 3.
Now only the packages under `zope` & `zope.app` packages works
using Python 2.5 . I don't know th
Alexander Limi wrote:
Will Zope 2 ever run on Python 2.5, or is that postponed indefinitely?
It will run on Python 2.5 when somebody makes it run.
We see an increasing amount of users trying to use Zope 2 with their
systems that have Python 2.5 as default.
Then I suggest you do something ab
On Thursday 01 November 2007 06:18:18 Andreas Jung wrote:
> --On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The recommendation is still "System python is evil, evil, evil" (quoting
>
Hello
I am trying to checkout latest version of z3c.rml and i get the following error:
svn co http://svn.zope.org/z3c.rml/ z3c.rml
svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/z3c.rml'
svn: PROPFIND of '/z3c.rml': 301 Moved (http://svn.zope.org)
Thanks,
--
Catalin Constantin
_
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Oct 31 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Thu Nov 1 13:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Wed Oct 31 21:46:50 EDT 2007
URL
On Nov 1, 2007, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
We
see an increasing amount of users trying to use Zope 2 with their
systems
that have Python 2.5 as default.
The recommendation is still "System python is evil, evil,
evil" (quoting Jim).
N, that's "evil evil evil evil". Geez. ;
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The recommendation is still "System python is evil, evil,
evil" (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to
On Nov 1, 2007, at 14:17 , Jim Fulton wrote:
We generally encourage not to use the system Python in everything
we ship (Windows, Mac and Unified installers all ship their own
Python)
Cool. Note that I think this problem will get worse as system
packages include more and more of the packag
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 81348:
Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure for
efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids looping over
all utilities when registering a new one.
You are changing what looks like persis
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The recommendation is still "System python is evil, evil, evil" (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to get their Plone site, it's a nece
I would like to point out that on this thread people are getting too
tied up with restrictions about *installing* stuff on the system
Python and forgetting that for example, buildout will not install
stuff on the system Python, but people might want to run a Zope (2)
buildout on Python 2.5 just bec
This tells you how to use the svn repository:
http://www.zope.org/DevHome/Subversion/ZopeSVNFAQ
/Tim
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Catalin Constantin wrote:
Hello
I am trying to checkout latest version of z3c.rml and i get the
following error:
svn co http://svn.zope.org/z3c.rml/ z3c.rml
svn
On Nov 1, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
I would like to point out that on this thread people are getting too
tied up with restrictions about *installing* stuff on the system
Python and forgetting that for example, buildout will not install
stuff on the system Python, but people might
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Catalin Constantin wrote:
> I am trying to checkout latest version of z3c.rml and i get the following
> error:
>
> svn co http://svn.zope.org/z3c.rml/ z3c.rml
> svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/z3c.rml'
> svn: PROPFIND of '/z3c.rml': 301 Moved (http://svn.zope.org)
T
Hey,
[making Zope 2 work on Python 2.5]
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
[snip]
I believe this is a critical issue and the interested parts need to
work together on it. Maybe the Plone Foundation and the Zope
Foundation can work together and setup a bounty to fund some developer
to do this work?
That's
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I think buildout should work harder to get along with system Python.
> I intent to spend some effort on this. Martijn has suggested an
> option to ignore site-packages which may go a long way.
Yeah, one of my clients uses workingenv to use sys
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> Log message for revision 81348:
>> Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure
>> for
>> efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids
>> looping over
>> all utilities when registering a new one.
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 81348:
Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure
for
efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids
looping over
all utilities when registering a
On 11/1/07, Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we are closely approaching the
> EOL for Python 2.4. Supposedly when Python 2.6 comes out next year
> Python 2.4 will be officially discouraged and will not receive any
> more fixes other than security fixes.
This seems to be a commo
On 11/1/07, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems to be a common misconception; I'm not sure why.
>
> Python 2.4 has *already* hit EOL. There will only be security fixes
> released in source form.
>
> When a new Python 2.X is released, a final 2.X-1 bugfix release is
> made and 2.X be
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 81348:
Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure
for
efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin6.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3029
Blamelist:
berndroessl,faassen,fdrake,geroldboehler,hannosch,jim,jukart,philikon,rossp,srichter,timt,witsch
BUILD FAILED: fa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Thursday 01 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I think buildout should work harder to get along with system Python.
>> I intent to spend some effort on this. Martijn has suggested an
>> option to ignore site-packages w
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin6.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3033
Blamelist: geroldboehler,hannosch,jim,witsch
BUILD FAILED: failed svn
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
zope.inferface.interface.InterfaceClass.__init__ defines a nice
attribute self.__identifier__ that stores self.__module__ + '.' +
self.__name__, which is very handy when indexing and searching
interfaces in Plone.
However, unlike __module__, __identifier__ is not part of the
IInterface declaration
In summary:
- Uploading eggs that have loose install_requires dependencies to the
cheeseshop is harmful.
- Taking non-Zope-the-appserver deployments into account, I'd be
suspicious of any "install_requires"
dependency on "zope.configuration" except in a Zope-the-appserver
meta-egg.
-
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The recommendation is still "System python is evil, evil,
evil" (quoting
Jim).
--On 1. November 2007 23:47:28 -0400 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Would it be possible to have a non-system python installed (by default
into /opt/python24) by the system python easy_install? I think it would be
useful to have eggs that provide commands on the path such as
easy_install_nonsystem24, virtualenv_nonsystem24, python_nonsystem24. With
a better spellin
30 matches
Mail list logo