On 02.11.2007, at 15:43, Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
zope.file was the *only* package of the 150+ I worked on that did
not have extras.
I'm surprised. I thought it was generally agreed upon not to do
that. Darn.
no - afaik there is no agreement upon this, and imho it is no
In zope/configuration/config.py:register it seems that it isn't being
asserted that no previous registration of a directive with the same
name has happened.
This might be desirable (not sure why) and currently happens for these
directives:
('http://namespaces.zope.org/meta', u'directive')
('http:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.11.2007, 10:03 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
> On Nov 7, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > the common criteria evaluation is using zc`s "Sharing" security
> > policy.
> > I need to specify a version number/name that describes the release
> > to be
On Nov 7, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
the common criteria evaluation is using zc`s "Sharing" security
policy.
I need to specify a version number/name that describes the release
to be
evaluated.
I'm sad to say that, while I still like this security policy, we're
no lo
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Nov 6 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Nov 7 13:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Nov 6 20:53:19 EST 2007
URL
Hey,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.11.2007, 06:04 -0500 schrieb Stephan Richter:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
> > A name proposal would be "Zope 3 Common Criteria Edition". The question
> > would be whether to let it have it's own version number (1.0) or to
> > start from the ver
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
> A name proposal would be "Zope 3 Common Criteria Edition". The question
> would be whether to let it have it's own version number (1.0) or to
> start from the version number of Zope 3.3 that it was built on.
I think it would be okay to start
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
> we're (still/again/...) working on the common criteria project. We're in
> a mode to try to finish it up and get done with.
Yipee.
> I feel that Zope3/trunk/doc/security is not the right location for those
> documents. I'd move them to a to
Hi,
the common criteria evaluation is using zc`s "Sharing" security policy.
I need to specify a version number/name that describes the release to be
evaluated.
The most straight forward thing I can think of is to create a branch
derived from the 3.3 release series that includes zc.sharing and is
Hi,
we're (still/again/...) working on the common criteria project. We're in
a mode to try to finish it up and get done with.
I feel that Zope3/trunk/doc/security is not the right location for those
documents. I'd move them to a top level project in svn or something like
Zope3/common-criteria/.
10 matches
Mail list logo