On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:50:35 -0400, Benji York wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
As the community (apparently) strongly favors doctest over
unittest, I wrote my first test based on zope.testing.doctest. And
promptly, I was badly surprised
In order to analyse a difficult problem, I added from
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 19:10:49 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just adding my few requirements:
- Integration into the component architecture in such a way that I
can specify the db connection parameters in ZCML and that
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:07:56AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 21:29:43 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What defines if something is the instance configuration?
Isn't ZCML just another format of configuration file? I agree it's evil
to hardcode database
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Apr 10 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Apr 11 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Apr 10 20:57:43 EDT 2008
URL:
--On 11. April 2008 10:09:16 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:07:56AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 21:29:43 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What defines if something is the instance configuration?
Isn't ZCML just
--On 11. April 2008 08:36:43 +0100 Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 19:10:49 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just adding my few requirements:
- Integration into the component architecture in such a way
Andreas Jung lists at zopyx.com writes:
The way I use collective.lead in my book is to have it look up the
database settings in a local utility. That utility is editable via a
control panel page in Plone. I suspect that it'd be quite easy to do
something similar where the settings were
Brian Sutherland wrote:
[snip]
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem an option, right now, to avoid using ZCML
to setup database connections. So I'm not sure how you want to implement
your ideas?
collective.lead can do it without ZCML; you set up the right connection
by implementing a 'url' property
Andreas Jung wrote:
[snip]
Possibly a sane and clean solution but way of over-designed. I am
interested in simple and robust solutions that work and not in a
solution that adds more and more unnecessary layers just the sake of
having them :-)
It's a 1 liner to set up the connection in this
Brian Sutherland schreef:
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem an option, right now, to avoid using ZCML
to setup database connections. So I'm not sure how you want to implement
your ideas?
Something we did for an LDAP connection that needed the same kind of
server-dependent config: put an
Wichert Akkerman schreef:
Previously Reinout van Rees wrote:
Tres Seaver schreef:
Daniel Nouri wrote:
1.0dev-r27844 seems to be gone from PyPI.
Such a version should *never* have been released to PyPI (any egg /
source dist with an SVN revision number in its filename is *not*
suitable for
On 11.04.2008, at 10:09, Brian Sutherland wrote:
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem an option, right now, to avoid using
ZCML
to setup database connections. So I'm not sure how you want to
implement
your ideas?
+1
k, i didn't read the whole thread, but we (lovely systems) use
zope.storm
Previously Reinout van Rees wrote:
Wichert Akkerman schreef:
Previously Reinout van Rees wrote:
Tres Seaver schreef:
Daniel Nouri wrote:
1.0dev-r27844 seems to be gone from PyPI.
Such a version should *never* have been released to PyPI (any egg /
source dist with an SVN revision number in
Balazs Ree wrote at 2008-4-11 09:19 +0200:
...
In order to analyse a difficult problem, I added from dm.pdb import
zpdb; zpdb.set_trace() in the doctest (dm.pdb.zpdb is my Zope aware
PDB extension)
The standard PDB works fine. I'm sure you're extended version can be
tweaked to as well.
I
Bernd Dorn wrote:
[whether configuration should be in ZCML]
although it is a few lines of code to get db uris from somewhere else,
and this could also be application code.
I'm not against ZCML, as long as those lines of code to get the db URI
from application code also exist. A good API to
On Friday 11 April 2008, Bernd Dorn wrote:
although it is a few lines of code to get db uris from somewhere else,
and this could also be application code
if you use paster, you can stick options into your pater ini script. We are
currently doing this for a setting in our app.
Regards,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:21:45PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem an option, right now, to avoid using ZCML
to setup database connections. So I'm not sure how you want to implement
your ideas?
I have no need for ideas to be implemented. We're using SA within in
17 matches
Mail list logo
