Laurence Rowe wrote:
This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on SQLAlchemy
trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is released.
Maybe it's time to start depending on 0.5?
No problem with that from my side, though of course I think this means
beta3 should be released
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Jul 18 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Jul 19 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Jul 18 21:01:14 EDT 2008
URL: http://m
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
this came out of the ST project, where we constantly repeated this sort
of code.
Not that it matters much, but I think it was Martijn Faassen who wrote it.
... who worked on ST at the time and saw this pattern
On Jul 19, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Laurence Rowe wrote:
This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on
SQLAlchemy trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is
released.
Maybe it's time to start depending on 0.5?
No problem with that from my side, thoug
Hi there,
Thanks for the offer. I think this is up to Laurence to decide, I'd
say. I'm aiming my work at the 0.5 series so I'm fine with requiring
0.5.
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/z
Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on SQLAlchemy
> trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is released.
Could the fix be backported and a new release made? I have to have this
particular system ready for production next we
On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on
SQLAlchemy
trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is released.
Could the fix be backported and a new release made? I ha
Michael Bayer wrote:
On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
Laurence Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on SQLAlchemy
trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is released.
Could the fix be backported and a new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Log message for revision 88608:
> get rid of another collective'ism :)
> many people don't seem to know this, but you can do
>
> svn propedit svn:ignore
>
> There's no need to keep a separate file arou
Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think originally folks started doing this because the properties
> (svn:ignore, svn:externals) can't be viewed from the web interface.
> I'm not arguing for the practice, and in fact would prefer that we
> update the webapp to something which *can* expos
Hi, I've been developing tutorialtest ( http://grahamstratton.org/straightornamental/entries/z3ctutorialtest
), and hit on a couple of issues with zc.testbrowser.real. These may
be Firefox bugs, but I know very little about DOM stuff, and my
Javascript books are 11,000 miles away.
My web ap
11 matches
Mail list logo
