Hi,
the KGS turned from not-having-been-updated to missing. At least
regarding to my monitoring. What's happened?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:09:44 +0100 (CET)
From: nag...@mail.whq.gocept.com (nagios)
To: c...@gocept.com
Subject: ** PROBLEM alert - Zope Project Services
Darn. The moment I send the mail I realise that Stephan said he'll move
the URLs around.
I'll update my Nagios. Sorry for the noise.
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:17:11 +0100
Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
Hi,
the KGS turned from not-having-been-updated to missing. At least
regarding to
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Christian Theune wrote:
Darn. The moment I send the mail I realise that Stephan said he'll move
the URLs around.
I also cleared the directory for a short time earlier while upgrading to the
new KGS version. I have sym-linked most of the old links though.
Regards,
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Christian Theune wrote:
Darn. The moment I send the mail I realise that Stephan said he'll move
the URLs around.
I also cleared the directory for a short time earlier while upgrading to
the new KGS version. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 31, 2009, at 09:49 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Christian Theune wrote:
Darn. The moment I send the mail I realise that Stephan said he'll
move
the URLs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Jan 31, 2009, at 09:49 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Christian Theune wrote:
Darn. The moment I send the mail I realise that Stephan said
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:06 , Tres Seaver wrote:
If you could provide a little bit more context since I have no idea
how download.zope.org is managed I could look at it. I need to know
what the URLs are that do not work.
Probably the virtualhost
2009/1/31 Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu:
Hi everyone,
It is finally here! Thanks goes to everyone who involved!
Thank you!
BTW, there's some problems with python version requirement in the
tarball release. It does not accept python 2.5 while it should as
stated in the
Yay! Thanks for all that work, Stephan!
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:35:06 +0100
Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:06 , Tres Seaver wrote:
If you could provide a little bit more context since I have no idea
how download.zope.org is managed I could look
Chris Withers wrote at 2009-1-30 18:50 +:
Brian Sutherland wrote:
zope.configuration.x
zope.configuration.y
Please don't, having namespace packages that contain files (as
zope.configuration already does) breaks setuptools.
Then setuptools needs fixing.
But not for this purpose:
I
Hi there,
Recently there was a project called snakebite revealed:
http://www.snakebite.org/
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2009-January/000331.html
It's basically a whole bunch of machines that open source projects, in
particular Python related ones, can make use of for
While you guys are moving zope.app.container to zope.container and
those cleaning many dependencies, I'd also like to clean intid/catalog
related stuff. The whole thing consists of three main packages that
can be cleaned:
* zope.app.keyreference - it doesn't depend on any ZMI or container
stuff,
Hi,
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:59:52 +0300
Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com wrote:
While you guys are moving zope.app.container to zope.container and
those cleaning many dependencies, I'd also like to clean intid/catalog
related stuff. The whole thing consists of three main packages that
can be
On Jan 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
Please don't, having namespace packages that contain files (as
zope.configuration already does) breaks setuptools.
zope.configuration isn't a namespace package. It is simply a package
with subpackages.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope
Hey,
[snip plan to clean up more dependencies]
Awesome! As Christian said, this is pretty much what we've been doing.
You might want to mess around with z3c.recipe.compattest to run
compatibility tests after your changes, though it's still a bit finicky
and rather slow. But if you try it out,
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Jan 30 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Jan 31 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.7 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Jan 30 20:46:02 EST 2009
URL:
2009/1/31 Christian Theune c...@gocept.com:
WRT the ZODB issues: I've started working on a 'touch' tool for ZODB
that analyzes (pickle-based) storages for class references which are
missing in your code base and (if all class references exist) can touch
all objects that reference classes from
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
Zope 3.4 requires Python 2.4 or 3.5 to run.
/me goes to download Python 3.5.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Hi,
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:11:44 +0300
Dan Korostelev nad...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/31 Christian Theune c...@gocept.com:
WRT the ZODB issues: I've started working on a 'touch' tool for ZODB
that analyzes (pickle-based) storages for class references which are
missing in your code base and
Hey,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
Well, I chose packages that are kind of separated from most of zope
the application packages, because there aren't many packages that
depend on either zope.app.catalog or zope.app.intid/keyreference. So I
think we can do that work at the same time. However, it may
2009/1/31 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
Well, I chose packages that are kind of separated from most of zope
the application packages, because there aren't many packages that
depend on either zope.app.catalog or zope.app.intid/keyreference. So I
think we can do
Hi folks,
The deadline for the O'Reilly Open Source Convention Call For
Participation is Tuesday Feb 3rd.
OSCON will be held July 20-24 in San Jose, California.
As of today, there are no Zope-related proposals, so yours could have a
pretty good chance of acceptance. ;-)
There have been a lot
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 08:33, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
Hi everyone,
It is finally here! Thanks goes to everyone who involved!
Yeah \o/ Thank you Stephan.
--
Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Hey,
I've released our changes in zope.app.intid. We hadn't touched
zope.app.catalog and zope.app.keyreference.
Anyway, the trunks are yours.
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Hi there,
I've just made a lot of releases as the result of our dependency cleanup
sprint. There are more releases to be made, but I think I've released
the most important affected packages now. Christian Theune is going to
follow up and release some more packages that we touched, probably
Hi!
That's a great piece of work you did, thanks!
I've been following package releases and have noticed some mistakes
mainly in changelog formatting:
zope.proxy
=
3.5.0 (unreleased)
* Added support to bootstrap on Jython.
* Use zope.container instead of
Also, there's a bug in zope.traversing:
The getParents function of zope.traversing.api uses the getParents
method of IPhysicallyLocatable, which really is new ILocationInfo, but
this interface doesn't even declare getParents method and the
RootPhysicallyLocatable adapter in zope.traversing
Hey,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
That's a great piece of work you did, thanks!
I've been following package releases and have noticed some mistakes
mainly in changelog formatting:
zope.proxy
=
3.5.0 (unreleased)
* Added support to bootstrap on Jython.
* Use zope.container
2009/1/31 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
Also, there's a bug in zope.traversing:
The getParents function of zope.traversing.api uses the getParents
method of IPhysicallyLocatable, which really is new ILocationInfo, but
this interface doesn't even declare
I just finished working on zope's intid and keyreference packages.
The whole key-reference stuff is now moved in zope.keyreference
package and the new version of zope.app.keyreference is released that
only contains compatibility imports, so it makes no sense to depend on
zope.app.keyreference
Stephan Richter wrote:
It is finally here! Thanks goes to everyone who involved!
January 29, 2009 - The Zope 3 development team announces the Zope 3.4.0
release.
Excellent!
I have to say, though, that the download process is quite confusing.
Let's say I'm a Pythonista who wants to try out
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 06:21:27AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jan 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
Please don't, having namespace packages that contain files (as
zope.configuration already does) breaks setuptools.
zope.configuration isn't a namespace package. It is simply a
I also just checked in a hack to make old keyreference objects
loadable if zope.app.keyreference is gone because a buildout doesn't
depend on it after upgrade:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/checkins/2009-January/029890.html
I wonder if that kind of quick hack is okay to be released for the
2009/1/31 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
Also, there's a bug in zope.traversing:
The getParents function of zope.traversing.api uses the getParents
method of IPhysicallyLocatable, which really is new ILocationInfo, but
this interface doesn't even declare
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Would people be interested in working on making use of this platform? We
could use it for testing of a wide range of packages. Perhaps the ZODB
would be an interesting package to start with. If so we should approach
snakebite to see whether
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Jan 31, 2009, at 10:06 , Tres Seaver wrote:
If you could provide a little bit more context since I have no idea
how download.zope.org is managed I could look at it. I need to know
what the URLs are that do not work.
Probably the
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Christian Theune wrote:
I'm not sure this is relevant anymore. I guess this might be a better
URL now:
http://download.zope.org/zope3.4/3.4.0/pypi-poll-access.lock
Stephan?
Let's use one of these, since they do not depend the specifics of the KGS:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
BTW, there's some problems with python version requirement in the
tarball release. It does not accept python 2.5 while it should as
stated in the announcement.
Sigh, I only tested by specifying the Python version directly. I am too lazy
to
Hi all,
now that we have Zope 3.4.0 finally behind us, let's look forward. As I said
in the release notes, I am really willing to switch to a 6 months release
cycle again.
I think there are three areas that we can work on:
- Python 2.6 support.
I think this should be straight forward. We
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Shane Hathaway wrote:
So, my question is: what should the download page *really* say?
Consider that existing developers of Zope 3 don't actually need this
page at all since they already use zc.buildout. This page's audience,
then, is people who know little about
41 matches
Mail list logo
