Hi Shane
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.app.openidconsumer/ New
library for OpenID auth in Zope 3
Martijn Faassen wrote:
One question: why is this in zope.app? I think there's a consensus
we're trying to pull as much from zope.app as possible.
Is this going to provide a ZMI UI
Hi all,
I've put up a draft of a zope.pipeline proposal:
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/ZopePipeline
The proposal is intended to explain my thoughts on the subject more
thoroughly.
Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Hey,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/2/25 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
I hope in fact zope.app.* will soon become a dumping ground for
deprecated packages providing legacy ZMI support. Of course that will
need the consensus that the ZMI *is* legacy software. I think do we
already have
Dan Korostelev wrote:
Also, how easy is to integrate existing non-zopeish WSGI middlewares
into the zope.pipeline? Like some resource injectors or XHTML slimmers
and so on. It would be really great to be able to do that with single
ZCML directive.
You can do that with two ZCML directives. I
2009/2/25 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
One area that I'd like to see support for is some easy way to turn off
security proxies. It's rumored there is such a way but with Grok, we
ended up ripping them off repeatedly anyway. Am I right in that it
should be possible to put a WSGI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Shane
Betreff: [Zope-dev] Zope.pipeline proposal
Hi all,
I've put up a draft of a zope.pipeline proposal:
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/ZopePipeline
The proposal is intended to explain my thoughts on the
subject
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Do you know something about the performance of WSGI?
I whould be happy to see some perfomance tests comparing
WSGI with other server concepts.
WSGI is extremely lightweight, so WSGI itself isn't going to affect
performance. The WSGI servers I know about are reasonably
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
Also, how easy is to integrate existing non-zopeish WSGI middlewares
into the zope.pipeline? Like some resource injectors or XHTML slimmers
and so on. It would be really great to be able to do that with single
ZCML directive.
You can do that with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Shane
Betreff: [Zope-dev] Zope.pipeline proposal
Hi all,
I've put up a draft of a zope.pipeline proposal:
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/ZopePipeline
The proposal is intended to explain my thoughts
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I'm used to using Paste Deploy ini files to configure a WSGI pipeline.
Is this simply an alternative to that? If so, do we really need our own
alternative, or could we try to use the Paste Deploy stuff directly?
Yes, you can just use Paste Deploy instead of the
Hey,
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
In general, if you need full-on backward compatibility with the existing
behavior of Zope2 / Zope3 / Grok, switching to a paste-driven WSGI
pipeline doesn't gain you much speed (but it is not a loss, either).
If, for a given application, you can relax the BBB
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
What's the overhead of a WSGI middleware? Is the overhead cost in the
same order of magnitude as a simple function call with a return value or
is there something inherently more complex going on?
A WSGI middleware app is simply a callable thing that calls the next
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 14:33, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.net wrote:
Hi,
I wonder whether new development patterns
are going to emerge after this :)
https://bespin.mozilla.com/
It is definitely something that can replace the Zope 2 TTW pattern
with a Zope3 TTW pattern.
--
Lennart Regebro:
Hey,
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[snip]
create_request -- should this maybe have some compatibility with WebOb
requests?
I've looked at WebOb, and my impression is that Zope requests and WebOb
requests serve completely different purposes. A Zope request is
essentially
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 08:46, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.net wrote:
This will not make any change in dependency graph unless zope.location
become a namespace package.
Yeah, that was what I was thinking, but I just realized that it might
be tricky to have both a zope.location and a
Hi all
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Zope.pipeline proposal
Hey,
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
In general, if you need full-on backward compatibility with the
existing behavior of Zope2 / Zope3 / Grok, switching to a
paste-driven
WSGI pipeline doesn't gain you much speed (but it is not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi all
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] Zope.pipeline proposal
Hey,
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
In general, if you need full-on backward compatibility with the
existing behavior of Zope2 / Zope3 / Grok, switching to a
Hi Tres
http://plope.com/whatsitdoing2
This is why zope.pipeline is such an important effort to me.
Not that it will immediately make things better, but it would
hopefully open up a path to move the Zope Framework
forward in this
area.
I absolutly agree!
As far as I can
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I'm used to using Paste Deploy ini files to configure a WSGI pipeline.
Is this simply an alternative to that? If so, do we really need our own
alternative, or could we try to use the Paste Deploy stuff directly?
Yes, you can just use Paste Deploy
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Do you know something about the performance of WSGI?
I whould be happy to see some perfomance tests comparing
WSGI with other server concepts.
WSGI is extremely lightweight, so WSGI itself isn't going to affect
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
clean_transaction -- is this not the same as repoze.tm2?
No. To mimic the current Zope publisher, we need to commit the
transaction shortly after the call application is finished, but then a
lot of things can still happen
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Tres
http://plope.com/whatsitdoing2
This is why zope.pipeline is such an important effort to me.
Not that it will immediately make things better, but it would
hopefully open up a path to move the Zope Framework
forward in this
area.
I absolutly agree!
As
22 matches
Mail list logo
