Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Laurent Mignon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2 weeks ago, I've implemented a support for nested group into the
>> branch svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/z3c.form/branches/sagblmi-nestedgroup
>>
>> All test pass and no compatibility issue.
>>
>> Can I merge it to the trunk?
>
> What's t
Previously Laurent Mignon wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
> > Laurent Mignon wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2 weeks ago, I've implemented a support for nested group into the
> >> branch svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/z3c.form/branches/sagblmi-nestedgroup
> >>
> >> All test pass and no compatibility issue.
On Wednesday 11 March 2009, Laurent Mignon wrote:
> Can I merge it to the trunk?
yes
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
Web Software Design, Development and Training
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://
Hi,
I've added a oneline bugfix to z3c.recipe.i18n that's pretty important
for me (97979).
Could someone release it? or add me as an owner in pypi so I can do it
myself? My pypi username is jinty.
--
Brian Sutherland
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev
Hi Brian
> Betreff: [Zope-dev] Releasing z3c.recipe.i18n?
>
> Hi,
>
> I've added a oneline bugfix to z3c.recipe.i18n that's pretty
> important for me (97979).
Thanks a lot!
> Could someone release it? or add me as an owner in pypi so I
> can do it myself? My pypi username is jinty.
Just a
Hey,
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
> - -1 on having "configuration dependecies," including having mandatory
> tests that ZCML will load:
You mean mandatory ZCML loaded by tests? You seem to write the reverse
here, and I don't understand what that could mean.
> "mandatory configuration is a contrad
Hey,
Thanks for bringing this up and describing the problem so clearly. I'm
going to answer with a bunch of questions in the hope it will lead us
into the right direction for this problem.
Dan Korostelev wrote:
[snip]
> Another solution which I like much less is to move those adapters to
> "zop
Hey,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> I decided to start a new branch of that, because there's no still
> response on my requests for a release.
I see that you have access to that package now. Could you also give
srichter access to zope.component?
Regards,
Martijn
_
Hey Dan,
Thanks very much for this analysis and summary! My comments below.
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> To be honest, I don't quite get the difference between zope.ManageSite
> and zope.ManageServices. Can someone clear this point for me? May be
> they should be merged somehow.
I'm afraid I don't kn
Hi,
I'm writing a custom file widget for z3c.form that works like the
Archetypes file widget that Plone uses and the formlib widget in
collective.namedfile. That is, after you've uploaded a file once, you're
given a radio button to decide whether to upload a new file, or leave
the existing fil
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> I'm writing a custom file widget for z3c.form that works like the
> Archetypes file widget that Plone uses and the formlib widget in
> collective.namedfile. That is, after you've uploaded a file once, you're
> given a radio button to decide whether
2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
> [snip]
>> Another solution which I like much less is to move those adapters to
>> "zope.authentication" and define an extra dependency (sigh) on
>> zope.publisher, but then the package won't be so nice, clean and
>> generic as it could be. :-)
2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
> Hey,
>
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> I decided to start a new branch of that, because there's no still
>> response on my requests for a release.
>
> I see that you have access to that package now. Could you also give
> srichter access to zope.component?
Okay, done. Shoul
2009/3/12 Stephan Richter :
> On Thursday 12 March 2009, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> I'm writing a custom file widget for z3c.form that works like the
>> Archetypes file widget that Plone uses and the formlib widget in
>> collective.namedfile. That is, after you've uploaded a file once, you're
>> given
Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> "mandatory configuration is a contradiction
>> in terms." I therefore don't believe that tests which try to load ZCML
>> are useful, at least for "library" pacakges (as opposed to "applications").
>
> Yeah, I know you're a purist on this topic.
>
> Here are some observ
2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
> Thanks very much for this analysis and summary! My comments below.
[...snip...]
Okay, the move is now done.
> Anyway, we can always move zope.ManageApplication into
> zope.app.applicationcontrol when we want to, so leave it in
> zope.app.security for now.
+1
--
W
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> 2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
>> Hey,
>>
>> Dan Korostelev wrote:
>>> I decided to start a new branch of that, because there's no still
>>> response on my requests for a release.
>> I see that you have access to that package now. Could you also give
>> srichter access to zope.
2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> 2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> Dan Korostelev wrote:
I decided to start a new branch of that, because there's no still
response on my requests for a release.
>>> I see that you have access to that package now. Could you
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Okay, it's released now. Expect some test breakage for the first time,
> until we adapt our packages to the removal of bbb interfaces. I'll try
> to do that quickly and then run the KGS and compat tests.
With all these refactorings going on, we re
Chris McDonough wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
>> Sometimes you can only test a library when a particular utility or
>> adapter or event handler is registered. The library uses this utility or
>> adapter in its own logic and while the utility or adapter is intended to
>> be replaceable (
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Just to note, there's already the NOT_CHANGED constant in
> z3c.form.interfaces.
Yep, good point.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
Web Software Design, Development and Training
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
___
Hey Dan,
Thanks for your answer.
Go ahead and make zope.publisher depend on zope.authentication. Could
you document a summary of this discussion within the Python code that
implements these adapters? (or the ZCML if you think that's better)
As a general point, right now the whole idea to use a
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Thursday 12 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> Okay, it's released now. Expect some test breakage for the first time,
>> until we adapt our packages to the removal of bbb interfaces. I'll try
>> to do that quickly and then run the KGS and compat tests.
>
> With all th
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Stephan, what would be involved to bringing this buildout to
> something.zope.org? Would that even be a good idea? The French Python
> association runs this now, right?
We should ask ccomb (Chsristopher), though I think other people chipping in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
> [snip]
>> - -1 on having "configuration dependecies," including having mandatory
>> tests that ZCML will load:
>
> You mean mandatory ZCML loaded by tests? You seem to write the reverse
> here, and I don
Please, can someone review the current zope.site's trunk? It fails the
"persistent_interfaces" tests.
I didn't ever work with persistent code, so I don't have idea about
what's going on. But I'd like to make a release of this package.
Anyone?
--
WBR, Dan Korostelev
_
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 19:55, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> The parameter was pointless in the first place.
> One and only one value for it worked -- the one that could be
> determined automatically.
Which is why it was removed. :) (and also, I think there was a use
case where the one calling the param
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Thursday 12 March 2009, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> I'm writing a custom file widget for z3c.form that works like the
>> Archetypes file widget that Plone uses and the formlib widget in
>> collective.namedfile. That is, after you've uploaded a file once, you're
>> given a ra
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Could I maybe create a custom validator that checks for a magic
> constant? If so, how? I have both a custom field (in the zope.schema
> sense) and a custom widget.
Yeah. I could swear I implemented this before. A validator is an adapter for
the f
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Thursday 12 March 2009, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Could I maybe create a custom validator that checks for a magic
>> constant? If so, how? I have both a custom field (in the zope.schema
>> sense) and a custom widget.
>
> Yeah. I could swear I implemented this before. A va
30 matches
Mail list logo
