On Friday 10 April 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Is anyone interested in maintaining Zope 3?
I am and anyone not using Grok or BFG should be. The Zope 3 KGS maintains
package compatibilities that reach beyond the Zope 3 Toolkit.
For example, it maintains compatibility over a very large set of z
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>
>> I've not done this yet:
>>
>>> 3) Change the Permission class in AccessControl so that it tries to
>>> look up an IPermission utility and use the title of that utility as the
>>> permission name
Andreas Jung wrote:
>> Yes, so this change introduced a bug. Who's the right person to fix it?
>> What's the right collector to report this in?
>
> Since Acquisition is a core module of Zope: the Zope 2 tracker on Launchpad.
Done:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/360761
Now, who knows how
Hi All,
Any ideas what this means or where it's coming from?
Module ZODB.Connection, line 808, in setstate
Module ZODB.Connection, line 876, in _setstate
Module ZODB.serialize, line 604, in setGhostState
Module ZODB.serialize, line 597, in getState
TypeError: ('argument list must be a tuple', , N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13.04.2009 17:58 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> The change you are interested in is probably:
>>
>> http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/lib/python/Acquisition/_Acquisition.c?rev=94905&r1=92577&r2=94905
>>
>> Acquisition now proxy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> I've not done this yet:
>
>> 3) Change the Permission class in AccessControl so that it tries to
>> look up an IPermission utility and use the title of that utility as the
>> permission name, falling back on the current beh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baiju M wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Martijn Faassen
> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Is anyone interested in maintaining Zope 3?
>>
>> With Zope 3 I mean:
>>
>> * the thing with the ZMI - do you care about the ZMI?
>>
>> * the thing that can
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> The change you are interested in is probably:
>
> http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/lib/python/Acquisition/_Acquisition.c?rev=94905&r1=92577&r2=94905
>
> Acquisition now proxy real iteration via __iter__ correctly (it didn't
> do that before). What is missing from that cha
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Martijn Faassen
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is anyone interested in maintaining Zope 3?
>
> With Zope 3 I mean:
>
> * the thing with the ZMI - do you care about the ZMI?
>
> * the thing that can be installed as a particular development platform -
> do you care about th
On 4/13/09 10:33 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> I understand that people like Zope 2 for historical reasons and Grok for it's
>> simplicity, but I would really wonder that there's no target audience for
>> various ideas/patterns in Zope 3 (security model, ZCML...).
>
> There is, but those who prefer
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
>
> > -1 from my standpoint. Two of my projects are fully based on the Zope 3
> > server, and switching to something else would be quite some pain.
>
> FWIW, I think you're absolutely right. We can't just declare it "dead"
> because i
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:49, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> I personally find it interesting that people are that fast with turning around
> and killing off things. I personally based my decision for Zope 3 on Philipps
> book ("Web Compontent Development with Zope 3"), whereas the latest edition
>
Hi Martin
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: zope-dev-bounces+dev=projekt01...@zope.org
> [mailto:zope-dev-bounces+dev=projekt01...@zope.org] Im
> Auftrag von Martin Aspeli
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. April 2009 13:07
> An: zope-dev@zope.org
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] who wants to maintain
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Apr 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Apr 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Apr 12 20:40:43 EDT 2009
URL: http://
Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
> -1 from my standpoint. Two of my projects are fully based on the Zope 3
> server, and switching to something else would be quite some pain.
FWIW, I think you're absolutely right. We can't just declare it "dead"
because it is convenient to our goal of having clearer
Am Samstag 11 April 2009 15:05:31 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
> Roger Ineichen wrote:
> >> Betreff: [Zope-dev] who wants to maintain Zope 3?
> >> Is anyone interested in maintaining Zope 3?
>
> /me is certainly not
>
> >> With Zope 3 I mean:
> >
> > I think we should take a look if we can build a mi
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I've now implemented 1 and 2 on trunk, since they seem pretty
non-controversial.
> 1) Use an event handler to ensure that any declared in
> ZCML actually creates a valid, Zope 2 permission. I have working code
> for this here which we could put in Products.Five with eas
Chris Withers wrote:
> If you try and iterate over an instance of this class, you get an
> AttributeError: __iter__. This doesn't make a lot of sense, since you
> *don't* get an error like that if you iterate over an instance of:
>
> class X:
>def __getitem__(self,i):
> return 1
The ch
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> It does not go wrong with Zope 2.11/Python 2.4, neither.
> Maybe, changes done for Python 2.5/2.6 compatibility broke something.
>
> Here is a simpler script to check for problems:
Indeed:
>>> class C:
... l=[1,2,3]
... def __getitem__(self, i):
... return self.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:14, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> When upgrading from Zope 2.8 to Zope 2.11, I had to fight for
> several hours because Zope 3 interfaces have been changed:
True, you went from Zope 3.0 to 3.3 in one swoop there, and the
changes was significant. But most of this changed beca
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote at 2009-4-12 18:31 +0800:
>>
>> Finally, there is not total parity between Zope 2 security and Zope 3
>> security. Zope 2 cannot protect 'property set', for example.
>
> Since Zope 2.8, Zope 2 could in principle -- and until quite recently
> I thoug
Chris Withers wrote at 2009-4-13 03:14 +0100:
>The context for this is trying to get ParsedXML 1.5 running on Zope 2.12
>under Python 2.5 (don't ask why!)
>
>Anyway, ParsedXML has a class:
>
>class ManageableNodeList(ManageableWrapper, DOMProxy.NodeListProxy,
> Acquisition
22 matches
Mail list logo
