Hello Malthe,
The problem that I see here with lxml is that it is used for output
checking. Even worse z3c.form requires at least 2.1.1 of lxml, where KGS
3.4 has lxml nailed at 1.3.6.
This burpes already on buildout.
Now even if I would ignore this requirement for testing, (and testing)
how could
Hi,
So, we determined that OFS.Traversable's unrestrictedTraverse()
shouldn't grow support for IPublishTraverse, which is fair enough. We're
now using an ITraversable adapter instead (++namespace++).
However, we found another inconsistency. In URL traversal, this works:
/foo/bar/++namespace+
Chris McDonough wrote:
> On 5/22/09 1:11 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> After some work we'd gotten it down to this:
>>
>> http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles2.svg
>>
>> And by now the main cycles left are these:
>>
>> http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles3.
I just released a new version of zope.mimetype. This version no longer
depends on zope.app.component directly.
--
Alex Smith
Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
*
On 5/22/09 1:11 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> After some work we'd gotten it down to this:
>
> http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles2.svg
>
> And by now the main cycles left are these:
>
> http://startifact.com/depgraphs/zope_app_publisher_cycles3.svg
>
> So, the only dependency
Hi there,
This is a progress report on the package dependency refactoring work.
We've had a lot of people contribute to this process (thanks
everybody!), and bit by bit we are able to make a serious impact on
dependencies. Yay!
Let's take for example zope.app.publisher, which a few weeks ago h
Hey,
Alexander J Smith wrote:
> I just released a new version of zope.app.publisher. The changes in
> this version are largely related to reducing dependencies on
> zope.app.component and zope.app.container.
Thanks very much for doing this work!
I could actually remove the (direct) test-depen
Hey,
Chris McDonough wrote:
[snip]
> I tried to go after this today (reversing the dependency setup between
> zope.formlib and zope.app.form). There are hundreds of changes that need to
> be
> made to move interfaces to zope.formlib. I made them (more or less
> mechanically) but then couldn'
Alexander J Smith wrote:
> I released a new version of zope.app.component to fix a bug introduced
> in the recently deprecation of its metadirectives. Packages that were
> broken by this should use this new version.
Oops: sorry for the breakage and thanks very much for the fix!
Regards,
Marti
On May 21, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Malthe Borch wrote:
> 2009/5/21 David Glick :
>> Won't this cause problems if a z3c.form uses a template which calls
>> a macro
>> from a traditional Zope page template? That is, make it impossible
>> to use
>> z3c.form in a site that isn't using z3c.pt for ever
I just released a new version of zope.app.publisher. The changes in this
version are largely related to reducing dependencies on zope.app.component
and zope.app.container.
--
Alex Smith
Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-
I released a new version of zope.app.component to fix a bug introduced in
the recently deprecation of its metadirectives. Packages that were broken
by this should use this new version.
--
Alex Smith
Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maill
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu May 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri May 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu May 21 21:01:38 EDT 2009
URL: http://
13 matches
Mail list logo
