Hello,
I have been working with hurry.workflow in a project and had some
questions about making hurry.workflow work with different work flows.
For this project each class can have a different work flow with it's own
set of states and transitions. All of the instances of a given class
share the
I have released two new packages to PyPI. These packages were inspired by
(design almost entirely stolen from) zope.component and zope.configuration. I
don't really expect them to get much use, but writing them was enlightening.
Maybe they'll be interesting to someone who wants to introduce pe
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip[
> I made it possible to override proxying by overriding the proxy
> method. At this point, I think zope.app.publication provides a pretty
> reasonable base class for custom publication implementations, although
> the module arrangement could be made a bit simpler.
C
On Jun 22, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe it's time for an svn commit police squad?
> 22 .py files have tabs... and I grepped only zope.* packages.
FWIW, to state the probably obvious, other projects handle this with
varying degrees of increased control.
Some require
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maybe it's time for an svn commit police squad?
/me readies the tear gas.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.z
Hello,
Maybe it's time for an svn commit police squad?
22 .py files have tabs... and I grepped only zope.* packages.
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZER mailto:agros...@gmail.com
--
Quote of the day:
Selfishness is the most basic motivation
__
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:01:16AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> - Create zope.publication from zope.app.publcatiobn
>>> - use webtest rather than zope.app.testing.
>>
>> What's webtest?
>
> http://pythonpaste.org/webtest/
>
> It's sort of like zope.app.testing.functional or zope.testbrowser but
>
On Monday 22 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
> 2 examples:
>
> - Use a Python-based proxy that's good enough for supporting access
> control in trusted code. (It wouldn't protect against devious
> untrusted code, but most applications don't really need to run
> untrusted code.)
>
> - Use a bette
Hi Jim
Yeah I meant my ugly hacks getting rid of the 'c' in zope.proxy and
zope.security
aren't going to get supported by anyone, whereas having a supported way of
substituting proxies and security would be great. All the import
dependancies that existed when I went through the excercise meant ug
On Jun 22, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>> Big +1 from me on this.
>>
>> Cool.
>>
>>> I had to do a whole lot of hacks to get this stuff running on app
>>> engine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
>
>> Big +1 from me on this.
>
> Cool.
>
>> I had to do a whole lot of hacks to get this stuff running on app
>> engine and basically
>> had to gut zope.proxy which was ugly
>
>
On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote:
> Big +1 from me on this.
Cool.
>
> I had to do a whole lot of hacks to get this stuff running on app
> engine and basically
> had to gut zope.proxy which was ugly
How so?
> and obviously unsupported.
I don't think so. What makes you think i
On Jun 21, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
...
>> Thoughts?
>
> +1. I would also like to be able to break the current
> zope.app.publication dependencies within Zope2:
>
> - ZPublisher.BaseRequest uses zope.app.publication for the
> EndRequestEvent class
>
> - Products.Five.compuonent like
On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:08 AM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:55:50AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> - It aggressively proxies objects using
>> zope.security.checker.ProxyFactory. Some people don't want
>> to use proxies and those that do might want to use a different
>> proxy
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jun 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Jun 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Jun 21 21:02:17 EDT 2009
HI
Big +1 from me on this.
I had to do a whole lot of hacks to get this stuff running on app engine and
basically
had to gut zope.proxy which was ugly and obviously unsupported.
After getting this running which was a big task I decided to go with
repoze.bfg which
just didn't have the security prox
Hi, thank you for all that answers, this was really helpful!
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:18, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Patrick Gerken
> wrote:
> > A testcase in my code fails, and after a lot of digging, I am finding
> that
> > the reason are wrong results from
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
> A testcase in my code fails, and after a lot of digging, I am finding that
> the reason are wrong results from the catalog. The catalog returns bad
> results because he caches the results in the request.
> My test consists of a number of ste
On Jun 21, 2009, at 9:40 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Sunday 21 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Thoughts?
>
> +1. Sounds really good!
>
> BTW, I would love to hear about a practical example for overriding
> proxy()
> other than turning off security altogether.
2 examples:
- Use a Python-b
On Jun 21, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I don't agree. The semantics are different. For example, you often
>> want to traverse to things in a template that you don't want to
>> expose
>> via URL. We currently (or last time I checked) expose ++resource+
>> +name
On 2009-06-16, Patrick Gerken wrote:
>
> A testcase in my code fails, and after a lot of digging, I am finding that
> the reason are wrong results from the catalog. The catalog returns bad
> results because he caches the results in the request.
> My test consists of a number of steps, for multiple
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:55:50AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> - It aggressively proxies objects using
> zope.security.checker.ProxyFactory. Some people don't want
>to use proxies and those that do might want to use a different
> proxy or checker implementation.
Grok's publication sub-clas
22 matches
Mail list logo