* Jim Fulton j...@zope.com [2009-08-12 01:36]:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jim Fultonj...@zope.com wrote:
- The versions specified in the controlled-packages.cfg don't seem to
be honored except for the package being tested. For example,
ZODB3-3.9.0b2 is used for test-kgs-ZODB3, but
Martijn Faassen wrote:
One question to ask is whether getParent and getParents are used all over
the place or just by zope.traversing. If they're only used by
zope.traversing we might not want to move them to a more general place,
but perhaps we can even see about removing them.
getParent is
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Thomas Lotzetho...@thomas-lotze.de wrote:
...
getParent is used by a number of zope.app.* packages (apidoc, container,
dependable, onlinehelp, preference, rotterdam, pythonpage, workflow). Its
only other occurrence is in zope.traversing where it is defined, but
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Wolfgang Schnerringw...@gocept.com wrote:
* Jim Fulton j...@zope.com [2009-08-12 01:36]:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jim Fultonj...@zope.com wrote:
- The versions specified in the controlled-packages.cfg don't seem to
be honored except for the package
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Thomas Lotzetho...@thomas-lotze.de wrote:
Jim Fulton j...@zope.com schrieb:
I object to removing API functions that client code might use. (Was
that a trick questions?) What is the point of this exercise?
Sorry, this message shouldn't have been sent in the
* Jim Fulton j...@zope.com [2009-08-12 11:52]:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Wolfgang Schnerringw...@gocept.com wrote:
* Jim Fulton j...@zope.com [2009-08-12 01:36]:
In playing with this today, I'm inclined to think that it would be
simpler to use a list of packages in an option to specify
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Aug 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Aug 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 7 messages: 7 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Aug 12 04:33:49 EDT 2009
URL:
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:17:41PM +0200, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
just fyi: the bug is also present in zope.testing 3.7.7 (showing up when
testing plone.z3cform). would it perhaps be possible to release a fixed
3.7.8 soon, so that our buildout stops complaining again?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Wolfgang Schnerringw...@gocept.com wrote:
* Jim Fulton j...@zope.com [2009-08-12 11:52]:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Wolfgang Schnerringw...@gocept.com wrote:
* Jim Fulton j...@zope.com [2009-08-12 01:36]:
In playing with this today, I'm inclined to think
Hello,
I've been working on making Plone use the standard Zope MailHost in place
of the custom Products.SecureMailHost we've been using since Plone 2.1
(See: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8814). During this process I've
run into a couple bugs in the MailHost implementation and I
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jim Fultonj...@zope.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Jim Fultonj...@zope.com wrote:
...
- The versions specified in the controlled-packages.cfg don't seem to
be honored except for the package being tested. For example,
ZODB3-3.9.0b2 is used for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Mitchell wrote:
Hello,
I've been working on making Plone use the standard Zope MailHost in place
of the custom Products.SecureMailHost we've been using since Plone 2.1
(See: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8814). During this process
Hi Folks
This is a quick and dirty change and to be honest the main reason I am
posting it here is so there is a searchable record
for anyone else who wants to use zope.deferredimport under google app
engine. (With some content models
zope.deferredimport is a great way of dealing with cyclic
On 13.08.09 01:03, Alec Mitchell wrote:
Hello,
I've been working on making Plone use the standard Zope MailHost in
place of the custom Products.SecureMailHost we've been using since
Plone 2.1 (See: http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8814). During this
process I've run into a couple bugs in
14 matches
Mail list logo
