* Jim Fulton j...@zope.com [2009-08-12 20:56]:
This seems heavier than needed. Also, if someone extends this,
they're going to get an awful lot of sections that might have names
that conflict with names in their buildout. I do like the fact that
the versions section is reusable. :)
Here's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 08/11/2009 11:39 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Christian Theunec...@gocept.com wrote:
Hi,
I took the Zope 3.4 KGS, removed the obvious packages that do not belong
to the ZTK out of the list and created a home for
On Aug 13, 2009, at 5:12, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 for the approach in general (I haven't looked at the patch in
detail). Assuming all tests pass, and that you have a test
exercising
the ':' bug you describe, I would
I am a !...@head ;-)
Forgot the else: clause in the code I posted. Corrected code is below.
T
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Tim Hoffman t...@zute.net wrote:
Hi Folks
This is a quick and dirty change and to be honest the main reason I am
posting it here is so there is a searchable record
I just came across the fact that an empty REQUEST contains
a key-value pair '-C : '' in REQUEST.form.
Does anyone know where this is coming from?
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. Co KG \ ZOPYX Friends
Charlottenstr. 37/1 \ The experts for your Python, Zope and
D-72070 Tübingen
I don't know where it is coming, but I have seen it in Zope 2.10 as well.
-Tom
Andreas Jung wrote:
I just came across the fact that an empty REQUEST contains
a key-value pair '-C : '' in REQUEST.form.
Does anyone know where this is coming from?
Andreas
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Wolfgang Schnerringw...@gocept.com wrote:
* Jim Fulton j...@zope.com [2009-08-12 20:56]:
...
Here's an alternative:
[versions]
zope.foo = 1.2.3
zope.bar = 1.2.3
zope.app.baz = 1.2.3
grok.bar = 1.1.0
thirdparty.dependency = 4.4
[ztk]
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Aug 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Aug 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 7 messages: 7 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Aug 12 20:53:22 EDT 2009
URL:
Hello,
* 2009-08-13 13:06, Jim Fulton wrote:
So, I think we now have a tool that will let us take the next steps. Can
we all agree on this?
Yey, great! I will update my buildbot instance to use this system.
Fabio
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm not sure why this all has to be computer readable. What is the
use case for computer readable knowledge of whether a package is in
the kgs or just used to test it? What is the need for computer
readable information about where the package is
On Friday 07 August 2009, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
If somebody tells me how it is possible to get projects from the
controlled-packages.cfg using zope.kgs, I can modify the recipe code to
understand it. :)
I did not use the precise jargon; read project wherever I write about packages
in the
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Andreas Jungli...@zopyx.com wrote:
On 13.08.09 01:03, Alec Mitchell wrote:
Hello,
I've been working on making Plone use the standard Zope MailHost in
place of the custom Products.SecureMailHost we've been using since
Plone 2.1 (See:
12 matches
Mail list logo
