On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> - Is Zope2 debug mode semantically equivalent to ZCML dev-mode, i.e.
> should the two be linked to each other in the first place?
I don't know what kind of functionality is usually switched on by the
zcml dev-mode. Are there any common examp
Andreas Jung wrote:
> I can not remember having seen any support this feature. If you need it,
> please add it to the Zope 2 trunk
I'll see about it ASAP.
> (however too late for the Zope 2.12 release, sorry :-))
That's fine.
--
Thomas
___
Zope-D
On 15.09.09 08:27, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
>> On 15.09.09 08:00, Thomas Lotze wrote:
>>
>>> - Is Zope2 debug mode semantically equivalent to ZCML dev-mode, i.e.
>>> should the two be linked to each other in the first place?
>>>
>>>
>> What is the ZCML dev-m
Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 15.09.09 08:00, Thomas Lotze wrote:
>> - Is Zope2 debug mode semantically equivalent to ZCML dev-mode, i.e.
>> should the two be linked to each other in the first place?
>>
> What is the ZCML dev-mode?
It's a so-called ZCML "feature" that can be used with ZCML condit
On 15.09.09 08:00, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> I asked this a month ago without getting any responses, so I'll give it
> one more try:
>
> We recently ran into an issue with debug/development mode when making
> z3c.hashedresource work with Zope2: The package implements different
> behaviour depending on
I asked this a month ago without getting any responses, so I'll give it
one more try:
We recently ran into an issue with debug/development mode when making
z3c.hashedresource work with Zope2: The package implements different
behaviour depending on whether the dev-mode feature is enabled in the ZCM
On Sep 3, 2009, at 10:53 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> FWIW, we forked zope.sendmail a while back (with the intent of
> eventually merging these changes back upstream) as
> "repoze.sendmail". It does not use any thread to do queue
> processing. Instead, a separate process can be run to han
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> My plan is to release Zope 2.12.0 final on October 1st 2009.
Sounds good.
> This will also be the official launch date of the new Zope 2 site.
Sounds even better.
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Sep 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Christian Theune wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Same here. We also ended up in many deadlock situations having to
>>> sacrifice chickens for SVN to resume operations. That's why we
>>> started
>>> investigating alternatives whi
My plan is to release Zope 2.12.0 final on October 1st 2009.
This will also be the official launch date of the new Zope 2 site.
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co KG \ ZOPYX & Friends
Charlottenstr. 37/1 \ The experts for your Python, Zope and
D-72070 Tübingen \ Plone p
Martijn Faassen, on 2009-09-11:
> (I think zest.releaser also does the version bumping before tagging if
> I'm not mistaken, even with SVN.)
Correct.
These are the svn logs of releasing a demo package:
$ svn log -v file:///home/maurits/tmp/repo/demo/
Hi,
On 09/14/2009 01:58 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hanno and I are working on the release engineering of the ZTK. We'll
> refactor the SVN structure a bit which will cause intermittent breakage
> for the next few hours.
>
> We'll give another heads up as soon as we're done.
We're don
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Sep 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Sep 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Sep 13 20:44:47 EDT 2009
URL: http://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Hanno and I are working on the release engineering of the ZTK. We'll
refactor the SVN structure a bit which will cause intermittent breakage
for the next few hours.
We'll give another heads up as soon as we're done.
Christian
- --
Christian Th
Adam GROSZER wrote:
> If you're thinking of testing the ZTK KGS packages, there shall be
> buildbots for that soon running tests on the (supported OSs x supported
> Python versions) matrix.
While this is nice, I think it's also a good idea to make it easy for
developers to run all relevant tests
Hello Thomas,
If you're thinking of testing the ZTK KGS packages, there shall be
buildbots for that soon running tests on the
(supported OSs x supported Python versions) matrix.
Monday, September 14, 2009, 7:49:01 AM, you wrote:
TL> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> Good point. I think right now the ZT
16 matches
Mail list logo
