Hello,
I added a coactivate project:
http://www.coactivate.org/projects/ploneconf2009-ztk-sprint/project-home
Thursday, October 1, 2009, 6:18:05 PM, you wrote:
FT> * 2009-09-30 18:04, Adam GROSZER wrote:
>> And ZTK sprinting?
FT> I'm not going to the Plone conference (at least officially), but
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>
>> Yeah! I added the Windows binary eggs for Python 2.4 to 2.6 to PyPi.
>
> Someone still needs to do this for:
>
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ExtensionClass/2.11.3
>
> I would, but I don't have the right PyPI acce
Hello,
That sounds impressing.
Definitely something to watch in the refactoring process is having all
this working on win32 ;-)
Thursday, October 1, 2009, 5:11:10 PM, you wrote:
HS> For mime type information it looks at:
HS> - all information found in the
HS> http://www.freedesktop.org/standar
* 2009-09-30 18:04, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> And ZTK sprinting?
I'm not going to the Plone conference (at least officially), but I'd be
interested in the ZTK sprinting. Anyone joining us? :)
Fabio
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zo
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> On behalf of the Zope 2 developers community I am pleased to announce
>> the official release of Zope 2.12.0.
>
> Yeah! I added the Windows binary eggs for Python 2.4 to 2.6 to PyPi.
Someone still needs to do this
Thomas Lotze wrote:
> I also wonder whether it might make sense to utilise the /etc/mime.types
> database (or the system's equivalent) for guessing based on the file-name
> extension,
The Python mimetypes module already uses that file in any of the
"standard" Unix locations.
> and libmagic (if
2009/10/1 Martin Aspeli :
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> The standard file implementation has no knowledge of its size, as this
>> is sometimes impossible to get, when dealing with stream based
>> file-like objects. Do we really need to have files to know their size?
>
> Well, for the writeFile() st
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> I also wonder whether it might make sense to utilise the /etc/mime.types
> database (or the system's equivalent) for guessing based on the file-name
> extension, and libmagic (if available) for magic-number tests based on
> file contents. But o
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Thomas Lotze wrote:
>> Following up to Martijn's observations on the ZTK, I'd like to propose a
>> clean-up of how we handle content types. There are several unrelated
>> pieces of code concerned with content types, these include at least
>> zope.contenttype, zope.mimetype and
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 04:50, Andreas Jung wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the launch of a new website dedicated to the
> Zope 2 application server:
>
> zope2.zope.org
Cool!
--
Sebastien Douche
Twitter: http://bit.ly/afkrK (agile, python, open source)
_
Thomas Lotze wrote:
> Following up to Martijn's observations on the ZTK, I'd like to propose a
> clean-up of how we handle content types. There are several unrelated
> pieces of code concerned with content types, these include at least
> zope.contenttype, zope.mimetype and zope.publisher.contenttyp
Am 01.10.2009, 15:51 Uhr, schrieb Martin Aspeli :
> Haha. Maybe I'll have a property mimeType instead? That looks better, I
> guess.
+1 to use a property rather than a getter. Not sure about content-type vs.
mime-type. If this is used only in an HTTP environment then I'd prefer to
stick with
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Martin Aspeli
> wrote:
>> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any reason to invent a new API and not just use Python's file API?
>> I don't know. IReadFile and IWriteFile have been around for ever and are
>> used by a number of thing
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
> On behalf of the Zope 2 developers community I am pleased to announce
> the official release of Zope 2.12.0.
Yeah! I added the Windows binary eggs for Python 2.4 to 2.6 to PyPi.
> I would like to thank all people having contributed to this re
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Sep 30 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Oct 1 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Sep 30 20:47:30 EDT 2009
URL: http://
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason to invent a new API and not just use Python's file API?
>
> I don't know. IReadFile and IWriteFile have been around for ever and are
> used by a number of things in Zope. They have read(), writ
Andreas Jung wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the launch of a new website dedicated to the
> Zope 2 application server:
>
> zope2.zope.org
>
> This site gives the Zope 2 application a much better representation on
> the web (which was more than necessary after having lived for
17 matches
Mail list logo
