On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 08:26, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> I've tested the whole ZTK KGS using the current zope.testing's trunk and
> the only failing package was zope.minmax (already fixed in the trunk),
> because it imported zope.testing and used zope.testing.doctest, which fails
> now that doct
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Dec 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Dec 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Dec 23 20:37:04 EST 2009
URL: http://
* 2009-12-24 11:40, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 08:26, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> > I've tested the whole ZTK KGS using the current zope.testing's trunk and
> > the only failing package was zope.minmax (already fixed in the trunk),
> > because it imported zope.testing and use
On Dec 24, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> I don't think we can avoid the error, and to be honest I consider the code in
> zope.minmax to be wrong.
>
> """
> import zope.testing
> x = zope.testing.doctest.DocTestFile(...
> """
>
> The import is wrong, it should be "zope.testing.doc
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2009-12-24 15:43, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>> You did not import zope.testing.doctest, but the reference to it remains.
>> I don't think that's a fix.
>
> You are right, I committed the right fix.
I was just about to commit the same thi
* 2009-12-24 16:20, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> Before I release the egg on PyPI:
>
> 1. Should we release as 1.1.2 (a minor change), or
> 2. Does the removal of dependency on zope.testing warrants a
> bump to 1.2.0?
I think 1.1.2 is okey, you are not changing any behaviour
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> * 2009-12-24 16:20, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
>> Before I release the egg on PyPI:
>>
>> 1. Should we release as 1.1.2 (a minor change), or
>> 2. Does the removal of dependency on zope.testing warrants a
>> bump to 1.2.0
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> Of course, it may be worth trying if there is a critical mass of supporters.
Alternately, there could be a way of extending the standard doctest to
achieve this "feature" without pushing it into the standard library.
I'm ambivalent on t
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
>
>> * 2009-12-24 16:20, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
...
>>> FWIW, I preferred zope.testing.doctest reporting of 15 tests because
>>> that's the actual number of things being tested in
Running easy_install -i http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.2 Zope2 in
a virtualenv w/o site packages failed on the following dependency. It of
course was easy to easy_install docutils and finish the install
successfully.
Thanks,
- Jim
Installed
/home/binbrain/Programs/Zope2.12/lib/python2
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 14:50, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> I don't think we can avoid the error, and to be honest I consider the code
> in zope.minmax to be wrong.
>
> """
> import zope.testing
> x = zope.testing.doctest.DocTestFile(...
> """
>
> The import is wrong
No, that's perferctly correct
* 2009-12-25 07:32, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 14:50, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> > I don't think we can avoid the error, and to be honest I consider the code
> > in zope.minmax to be wrong.
> >
> > """
> > import zope.testing
> > x = zope.testing.doctest.DocTestFile(...
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
> Running easy_install -i
> http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.2 Zope2 in a virtualenv
> w/o site packages failed on the following dependency. It of course
> was easy to easy_install docutils and finish the install
> successful
13 matches
Mail list logo
