On 01/22/2010 07:59 PM, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm coding some stuff, using zope.app.authentication and this package
> appears to do too many things, in my opinion.
> Would it be wise to cut off some of the functionalities ? The pure PAU
> components could go in a dedicated pack
On 01/17/2010 04:34 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Attila Oláh wrote:
>
>> You can get the same result as with `pwd` by using --coverage=../../coverage
>
> D'oh! The current path is parts/test (via zc.recipe.testrunner). I did
> *not* expect that.
>
>
> I think this needs to be documented at least,
On 01/25/2010 03:15 AM, Baiju M wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Christophe Combelles wrote:
>> maybe just be sure the original author won't claim anything in the future?
>> ie. the logo should be released with a free licence. Just to avoid the kind
>> of
>> troubles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Baiju M wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Christophe Combelles wrote:
>>> Jens Vagelpohl a écrit :
>>> On 1/24/10 13:08 , Baiju M wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jan 24 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jan 25 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Jan 24 20:37:34 EST 2010
URL: http://
