Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder : zope.app.authentication

2010-02-08 Thread Michael Howitz
Am 05.02.2010 um 17:31 schrieb Souheil CHELFOUH: [...] If it's possible, I like to get the ownership on the zope.app.authentication so I can proceed with the release. What's your pypi-name? Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · m...@gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh co. kg ·

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder : zope.app.authentication

2010-02-08 Thread Souheil CHELFOUH
it's `trollfot` Thank you :) 2010/2/8 Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com: Am 05.02.2010 um 17:31 schrieb Souheil CHELFOUH: [...] If it's possible, I like to get the ownership on the zope.app.authentication so I can proceed with the release. What's your pypi-name? Yours sincerely, --

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder : zope.app.authentication

2010-02-08 Thread Michael Howitz
Am 08.02.2010 um 10:14 schrieb Souheil CHELFOUH: it's `trollfot` Thank you :) Done. Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · m...@gocept.com · software developer gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK

2010-02-08 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Feb 7 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Feb 8 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Sun Feb 7 20:37:01 EST 2010 URL:

[Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources

2010-02-08 Thread Gediminas Paulauskas
Hello Zope Developers, I am packaging many Zope libraries for Ubuntu. But my packages were rejected by archive admin because the source tarballs do not satisfy the inclusion requirements. From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic#Copyright : * The upstream tarball must contain

Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources

2010-02-08 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: Hello Zope Developers, I am packaging many Zope libraries for Ubuntu. But my packages were rejected by archive admin because the source tarballs do not satisfy the inclusion requirements. From

Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources

2010-02-08 Thread Gediminas Paulauskas
2010/2/8 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: Hello Zope Developers, I am packaging many Zope libraries for Ubuntu. But my packages were rejected by archive admin because the source tarballs do not satisfy the

Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources

2010-02-08 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: 2010/2/8 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: Hello Zope Developers, I am packaging many Zope libraries for Ubuntu. But my packages were

Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources

2010-02-08 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 2010-2-8 22:38, Tres Seaver wrote: In the mean time, you could patch the file in via your debian/ control stuff, I guess. The Ubuntu / Debian interpretation of legality of distribution is not controlling outside their universes, I think. It is since they require that the 'pristine upstream

Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources

2010-02-08 Thread Gediminas Paulauskas
2010/2/8 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: 2010/2/8 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: Hello Zope Developers, I am packaging many Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources

2010-02-08 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: On 2010-2-8 22:38, Tres Seaver wrote: In the mean time, you could patch the file in via your debian/ control stuff, I guess. The Ubuntu / Debian interpretation of legality of distribution is not controlling outside their

Re: [Zope-dev] No license distributed with sources

2010-02-08 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:54:45PM +0200, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: 2010/2/8 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com: In the mean time, you could patch the file in via your debian/ control stuff, I guess.  The Ubuntu / Debian interpretation of legality of distribution is not controlling outside