Re: [Zope-dev] Circular dependency hell.

2010-04-18 Thread Christophe Combelles
Tres Seaver a écrit : So far the main circularity was that everything depended on zope.testing as a testrunner, zc.buildout for making the development environment, and zope.testing obviously depended on zope.interface etc. I solved that by also adding support for setuptools/distributes

Re: [Zope-dev] Repository for the zope mail summarizer

2010-04-18 Thread Christophe Combelles
Patrick Gerken a écrit : Hi, I wanted to look into the script that summarizes the mails sent to zope-test. The best code I found is this http://cvs.zope.org/Packages/TestScripts/ but I suspect that there are newer versions, I just don't know where. I'd like modifiy the script to understand

Re: [Zope-dev] Circular dependency hell.

2010-04-18 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:37, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote: Depending on setuptools for tests in another evil thing. We should not assume a *setup* tool to be a testrunner, and we should not depend on the behaviour of setuptools to write tests. I'm not sure what you mean there,

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages

2010-04-18 Thread Godefroid Chapelle
On 17/04/10 23:20, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: snip - I can almost guarantee that any examples that aren't tested will be wrong. I tried to do a good job on the bobo docs. I made almost all of the examples executable, and the ones I

Re: [Zope-dev] Circular dependency hell.

2010-04-18 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 4/18/10 10:37 , Christophe Combelles wrote: Tres Seaver a écrit : So far the main circularity was that everything depended on zope.testing as a testrunner, zc.buildout for making the development environment, and zope.testing obviously depended on zope.interface etc. I solved that by also

Re: [Zope-dev] Circular dependency hell.

2010-04-18 Thread Christophe Combelles
Lennart Regebro a écrit : On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:37, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote: Depending on setuptools for tests in another evil thing. We should not assume a *setup* tool to be a testrunner, and we should not depend on the behaviour of setuptools to write tests. I'm

Re: [Zope-dev] Circular dependency hell.

2010-04-18 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:35, Christophe Combelles cc...@free.fr wrote: ok, not a lot, there is currently one single particular behaviour, which is adding tests from the result of the additional_tests function in a module. That probably won't hurt. Yeah, setuptools test discovery isn't very

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 10 OK, 4 Failed

2010-04-18 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Apr 17 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Sun Apr 18 12:00:00 2010 UTC. There were 14 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 7 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct at gocept.com. Test failures - Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 669

Re: [Zope-dev] Circular dependency hell.

2010-04-18 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christophe Combelles wrote: Tres Seaver a écrit : So far the main circularity was that everything depended on zope.testing as a testrunner, zc.buildout for making the development environment, and zope.testing obviously depended on zope.interface