Hello,
Someone please make a release of the above.
--
Best regards,
Adam
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailm
Am 19.04.2010, 22:22 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting :
> If you have anything else you want to get in, commit away or let me know.
> Cheers,
> Hanno
> P.S. I'm flexible on "the weekend", I can postpone the release until
> Monday.
Probably a good time to remind people that Saturday is bug day:
h
Hi.
I'm planning to do a new Zope 2.12.5 release this weekend.
Yvo is going to try to look some more into the unauthorized /
exception view interaction and I hope to get a ZODB 3.9.5 release from
Jim.
If you have anything else you want to get in, commit away or let me know.
Cheers,
Hanno
P.S.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:56:02PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> On 4/19/10 15:48 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> > def doctest_MyClass_bar():
>> > """Test MyClass.bar
>> >
>> > >>> y = MyClass()
>> >
>> >
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:28:37AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> > Hi Jim, hi Christian,
> >
> > any further thoughts on this?
>
> Not at this time. This is on my to-do list to look at.
>
> I think your use case would be better handled th
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:56:02PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 4/19/10 15:48 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > def doctest_MyClass_bar():
> > """Test MyClass.bar
> >
> > >>> y = MyClass()
> >
> > The bar method peforms a bar calculation that typically return
Hello Jonathan,
done
Monday, April 19, 2010, 6:56:34 PM, you wrote:
JB> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQ&output=html
>>
>> Anyone for/against those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Charlie Clark
> wrote:
>> Narrative documentation forces you to explain yourself to someone else.
>> Neither, however, will necessarily notice if you forget something: tests
>> aren't documentation
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQ&output=html
>
> Anyone for/against those versions?
Tres Seaver just released zope.securitypolicy 3.4.4 (3.4.3 was buggy)
Hi again!
yuppie wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> v is the html as generated by my view. Reraising the exception transfers
>> control to the bare except in
>> ZPublisher.Publish.publish_module_standard, which generates the standard
>> site error page and returns that.
>
> I would have expected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
> Test failures
> -
>
> Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 669 projects
> From: ct at gocept.com
> Date: Sun Apr 18 21:13:39 EDT 2010
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010
Hi!
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> I can't get an Unauthorized exception view to work with current Zope
> 2.12 svn. My approach was:
>
> - add a dummy PAS challenge plugin which does nothing, effectively
> delegating everything to my Unauthorized exception view
> - register a browser view for Unau
I can't get an Unauthorized exception view to work with current Zope
2.12 svn. My approach was:
- add a dummy PAS challenge plugin which does nothing, effectively
delegating everything to my Unauthorized exception view
- register a browser view for Unauthorized and return a proper error
mes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam GROSZER wrote:
> I'm somewhat vary on unittests. I've seen some damn cryptic ones that
> took a lot of time to decipher.
> A doctest somehow forces you to dump your mind (well at least that, if
> we're not that brilliant techdoc writers).
> OTOH
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> Hi Jim, hi Christian,
>
> any further thoughts on this?
Not at this time. This is on my to-do list to look at.
I think your use case would be better handled through
normal command-line option specification, as in:
buildout -c deploy
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 15:48, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> If you've the discipline to keep the doctests short, I don't see why you
>> shouldn't continue writing them instead of unit tests
>
> Because they are a bitch to debug, relies on det
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:50:23PM +0200, Adam GROSZER wrote:
>>
>> I'm somewhat vary on unittests. I've seen some damn cryptic ones that
>> took a lot of time to decipher.
>> A doctest somehow forces you to dump your mind (well at least th
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 16:03, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 15:48, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> If you've the discipline to keep the doctests short, I don't see why you
>> shouldn't continue writing them instead of unit tests
>
> Because they are a bitch to debug, relies on detai
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 15:48, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> If you've the discipline to keep the doctests short, I don't see why you
> shouldn't continue writing them instead of unit tests
Because they are a bitch to debug, relies on details of output, which
makes them brittle, hard to port to Python
Hi Jim, hi Christian,
any further thoughts on this?
best regards
florian
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:23:36PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > > We currently use it for 5 very similar sites that share one repository
> > > but use 5 c
On 4/19/10 15:48 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
> def doctest_MyClass_bar():
> """Test MyClass.bar
>
> >>> y = MyClass()
>
> The bar method peforms a bar calculation that typically returns
> twenty-three:
>
> >>> y.bar()
> 23
>
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:50:23PM +0200, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello Tres,
>
> Saturday, April 17, 2010, 3:41:02 AM, you wrote:
>
> TS> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> TS> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> +lots on more docs
> +lots on 100% coverage
>
> TS> The trickier testing bits we would re-write
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> OK, I made a branch of zope.testing that doesn't include the
> testrunner. That was easy peasy.
>
> http://svn.zope.org/zope.testing/branches/regebro-notestrunner/
>
> And I made a zope.testrunner:
>
> http://svn.zope.org/zope.testrunn
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Charlie Clark
wrote:
> Narrative documentation forces you to explain yourself to someone else.
> Neither, however, will necessarily notice if you forget something: tests
> aren't documentation and docu [sic]
Quite true. It is also true that tests should be well d
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Apr 18 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Apr 19 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 14 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 7 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct
at gocept.com.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 669
Am 19.04.2010, 12:50 Uhr, schrieb Adam GROSZER :
Before I start: + lots on the general idea. Zope's narrative documentation
is attrocious"[1] and we have lost users and developers as a result.
> I'm somewhat vary on unittests. I've seen some damn cryptic ones that
> took a lot of time to deciph
OK, I made a branch of zope.testing that doesn't include the
testrunner. That was easy peasy.
http://svn.zope.org/zope.testing/branches/regebro-notestrunner/
And I made a zope.testrunner:
http://svn.zope.org/zope.testrunner/trunk
That was pretty easy too. Except one thing: The shuffle feature
s
Hello Tres,
Saturday, April 17, 2010, 3:41:02 AM, you wrote:
TS> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
TS> Hash: SHA1
+lots on more docs
+lots on 100% coverage
TS> The trickier testing bits we would re-write as super thorough, no
TS> shortcuts-taken unit tests: one testcase class per class (or
Hello Christophe,
Sunday, April 18, 2010, 2:54:08 AM, you wrote:
CC> Adam GROSZER a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is a sheet with versions for KGS 3.4.1
>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tUE5Q72d4Kg1FXaacCA3EKQ&output=html
>>
>> Anyone for/against those versions?
>>
>> The open questio
29 matches
Mail list logo
