-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/6/10 18:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
+1 for dropping the test: if we aren't going to try to fix it to pass,
then scrap it. Note that I actually feel the same way about *all* the
every-day failures: the value of the every-day mail drops sharply
* Jan-Wijbrand Kolman janwijbr...@gmail.com [2010-10-06 13:39]:
On 10/6/10 12:49 PM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
* Jan-Jaap Driessenjdries...@thehealthagency.com [2010-10-05 18:09]:
Version 0.12.2 of z3c.recipe.compattest is not compatible with recent
versions of it's dependencies zc.buildout
On 10/7/10 08:52 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/6/10 18:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
+1 for dropping the test: if we aren't going to try to fix it to pass,
then scrap it. Note that I actually feel the same way about *all* the
every-day failures:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:50, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 10/7/10 08:52 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
For me personally the value has dropped so far that I am mostly ignoring
those emails. They are hard to parse to begin with and there are just
too many buildbot entries.
Likewise.
On 10/7/10 11:09 , Patrick Gerken wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:50, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 10/7/10 08:52 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
For me personally the value has dropped so far that I am mostly ignoring
those emails. They are hard to parse to begin with and there are
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
Perhaps more important is brevity. If the mail was a simple thing with a
maximum of 15 lines or so where you can immediately see if something is
wrong or not it would be much better. Something like:
PROBLEMS
On 10/7/10 11:26 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
Perhaps more important is brevity. If the mail was a simple thing with a
maximum of 15 lines or so where you can immediately see if something is
wrong or not it would be much
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:28, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 10/7/10 11:26 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
+1 for a brief summary, the direct links to the build results are
still important though and should be somewhere in the mail
Please don't forget we also have a page that links to
On 10/7/10 11:35 , Patrick Gerken wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:28, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 10/7/10 11:26 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
+1 for a brief summary, the direct links to the build results are
still important though and should be somewhere in the mail
Please
Hi!
Patrick Gerken wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:50, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 10/7/10 08:52 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
For me personally the value has dropped so far that I am mostly ignoring
those emails. They are hard to parse to begin with and there are just
too many
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Oct 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Thu Oct 7 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 45 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 8 from buildbot at pov.lt, 20 from
buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED :
Hi,
I was wondering whether it's possible to use callables for schema
vocabularies without registering them first?
ie.
def my_vocab(context):
while some_constraint:
yield zope.schema.SimpleTerm()
alsoProvides(my_vocab, zope.schema.interfacesIBaseVocabulary)
class
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
I was wondering whether it's possible to use callables for schema
vocabularies without registering them first?
No offense, but isn't this a question for a users mailing list? It's
not really about
On 10/6/10 10:27 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
On 10/6/10 9:53 AM, yuppie wrote:
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
This afternoon I merged the gary-0.8.0 branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The
recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to
release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
I was wondering whether it's possible to use callables for schema
vocabularies without registering them first?
...
I'm sure it should be possible but my weak and feeble brain has somehow
failed to solve the
Am 07.10.2010, 14:31 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
No offense,
None taken.
but isn't this a question for a users mailing list? It's
not really about developing Zope itself, but developing with Zope
isn't it?
I thought we were consolidating the mailing lists? It is a
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
I thought we were consolidating the mailing lists? It is a developer's
rather than a user's question but I would agree not related to ZTK
development.
Another consolidation? We already tossed the zope3-dev
On 10/7/10 10:20 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
* Jan-Wijbrand Kolmanjanwijbr...@gmail.com [2010-10-06 13:39]:
BTW, I discussed updating the z3c.recipe.i18n for similar reasons - to
support newer buildout features - in a separate thread. There people
seemed to be +1 on releasing a recipe that
Am 07.10.2010, 14:38 Uhr, schrieb Fred Drake fdr...@acm.org:
Another consolidation? We already tossed the zope3-dev list.
This was the suggestion at the summit:
http://wiki.zope.org/ztk/ZopeSummit2010Summary
Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting Research
German
Am 07.10.2010, 14:34 Uhr, schrieb Fred Drake fdr...@acm.org:
Have you tried using a callable that provides
zope.schema.interfaces.IContextSourceBinder?
Looking at the code in 3.7.0 (the newest zope.schema in my egg cache),
that should work out of the box.
Thanks for the tip. For a vocabulary
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
This was the suggestion at the summit:
http://wiki.zope.org/ztk/ZopeSummit2010Summary
Interestingly, I can't find anything that suggests consolidation by
searching that page for mail or list. Was that what
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 08:52:41AM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 10/6/10 18:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
+1 for dropping the test: if we aren't going to try to fix it to pass,
then scrap it. Note that I actually feel the same way about *all* the
every-day failures: the value of the
Am 07.10.2010, 14:58 Uhr, schrieb Fred Drake fdr...@acm.org:
Interestingly, I can't find anything that suggests consolidation by
searching that page for mail or list. Was that what
IRC/mailinglist rationalisation means?
Yes, that's the one.
Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark
On 10/07/2010 03:01 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 08:52:41AM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 10/6/10 18:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
+1 for dropping the test: if we aren't going to try to fix it to pass,
then scrap it. Note that I actually feel the same way about *all* the
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 01:58:31PM +0200, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Oct 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Thu Oct 7 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 45 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 8 from buildbot at pov.lt, 20 from
buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11
25 matches
Mail list logo
