I always found configuration overrides (e.g. ZCML's
directive) to be difficult to manage and hard to get right.
How about an alternative where you can put a priority on a
configuration context like so:
Default priority would be 0, traditional overrides get the maximum
priority. ZTK component
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
> I always found configuration overrides (e.g. ZCML's
> directive) to be difficult to manage and hard to get right.
>
> How about an alternative where you can put a priority on a
> configuration context like so:
>
>
I appreciate the flexibili
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Dec 1 13:00:00 2010 UTC to Thu Dec 2 13:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 72 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 19 from
buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 13 from ccomb at free.fr, 30 from jdriessen at
thehealthagency.com.
Test fa
On 2 December 2010 13:34, Benji York wrote:
> I appreciate the flexibility inherent in that approach, but personally,
> I'd be frightened of such a system. I sometimes have problems figuring
> out which directives are active in the current system, if I had to
> reason about dozens of priority lev
On Thursday, December 02, 2010, Malthe Borch wrote:
> As far as I understand, for a ZCML include override to work properly,
> you need to carefully make sure that your includes are in the exact
> right order and on the same level. In a system where two packages are
> trying to override the same com
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 07:26, Ross Patterson wrote:
>> Who would be interested in a sprint, when, where and how?
>
> I'd be interested in remote sprinting. I'm available now, FWIW.
OK, so it's me and you then. :-)
Let's talk in January about doing something and staying online at the
same time d
On 2 December 2010 14:37, Stephan Richter wrote:
> This explanation helped me to understand where you come from. I think I would
> be okay with the priority feature, but could we maybe limit it to the
> element? Since you can use this element anywhere and it can be
> nested, it should work well.
On 12/2/10 5:39 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 07:26, Ross Patterson wrote:
>>> Who would be interested in a sprint, when, where and how?
>> I'd be interested in remote sprinting. I'm available now, FWIW.
> OK, so it's me and you then. :-)
> Let's talk in January about doing
Am 02.12.2010, 14:19 Uhr, schrieb Malthe Borch :
> As far as I understand, for a ZCML include override to work properly,
> you need to carefully make sure that your includes are in the exact
> right order and on the same level. In a system where two packages are
> trying to override the same compo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2010 03:43 PM, Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am 02.12.2010, 14:19 Uhr, schrieb Malthe Borch :
>
>> As far as I understand, for a ZCML include override to work properly,
>> you need to carefully make sure that your includes are in the exact
>> right
10 matches
Mail list logo
