This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2011-07-14 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-07-15 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/
On 07/15/2011 03:13 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Martijn Faassen
> wrote:
>> I'd just call the category "web framework"; 2 out of 3 already say they
>> are. Zope can then itself say in its description that it's an
>> application server if that's an important ter
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> I'd just call the category "web framework"; 2 out of 3 already say they
> are. Zope can then itself say in its description that it's an
> application server if that's an important term.
At least zope2.zope.org uses the "web framework" term
Hey,
On 07/11/2011 06:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> According to zope.org Gork is more like ZPT than it is
>> like BlueBream. Griok is more like CMF than it is like BlueBream. This
>> is because Grok is listed under the grab-bag framework category.
>
> I partly agree with you - I think Grok can b
