Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2 WSGI investigation

2012-01-03 Thread Chris McDonough
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 07:32 +, Martin Aspeli wrote: On 3 January 2012 06:39, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 10:39 +, Martin Aspeli wrote: On 2 January 2012 08:50, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote: On 01/01/2012 08:39 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2 WSGI investigation

2012-01-03 Thread Sylvain Viollon
Op 1 jan 2012, om 20:39 heeft Martin Aspeli het volgende geschreven: Hi, Hello, There are three known WSGI implementations of the Zope 2 publisher. I've had a look at them and made some notes about what I think provides the best story: ## Zope 2.13 WSGIPublisher [...] ##

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2 WSGI investigation

2012-01-03 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On Jan 3, 2012, at 09:34 , Sylvain Viollon wrote: We use Paster as well in the stack, and use it to configure the Python logging process, you can configure there a logging to syslog, and after having a central syslog server. I think it is more professional like this, than using a tool in

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2 WSGI investigation

2012-01-03 Thread Wichert Akkerman
On 01/03/2012 10:04 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: On Jan 3, 2012, at 09:34 , Sylvain Viollon wrote: We use Paster as well in the stack, and use it to configure the Python logging process, you can configure there a logging to syslog, and after having a central syslog server. I think it is more

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2 WSGI investigation

2012-01-03 Thread Martin Aspeli
On 3 January 2012 08:01, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: Am I right in thinking Pyramid no longer uses repoze.tm2 or a middleware approach? What was the rationale for that design decision? You're right, Pyramid scaffolding no longer supplies repoze.tm2 or any other WSGI middleware

[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 56

2012-01-03 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-02 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-03 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: