[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 41, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-05-22 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-05-21 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-05-22 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-05-22 Thread Patrick Gerken
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote: > >>> [2]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit >>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html >>> >>> >>> [3]    FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit >>> http

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.

2012-05-22 Thread Tres Seaver
On 05/19/2012 05:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > On 05/19/2012 12:12 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: >> I propose that these deprecation warnings be removed. > > I can do that, if that is the consensus. Now done, and released as zope.interface 4.0.1. Tres. -- ===

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-05-22 Thread Tres Seaver
On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote: >> [2]FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit >> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html >> >> >> [3]FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit >> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063352.htm

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.

2012-05-22 Thread Tres Seaver
On 05/21/2012 04:49 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote: > 2012/5/20 Tres Seaver : >> On 05/19/2012 07:23 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: >>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Tres Seaver >>> wrote: >> They already do: 4.0.0 makes them exceptions under Python3: that >> fact was actually my rationale for the war

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.interface 4.0.0 considered annoying.

2012-05-22 Thread Tres Seaver
On 05/20/2012 04:28 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Tres Seaver > wrote: >> I will release a 4.0.1 silencing the warnings unless somebody speaks >> up in their favor. > > We should make sure we have 2to3 fixers for everything change as > well. I added some fixers, bu

Re: [Zope-dev] ZTK 1.0 lifetime

2012-05-22 Thread Patrick Gerken
Eek, I started mixing up ztk and zope.app I didn't look too deep into Zope2 because my intention was more for asking whether packages like zope.app.appsetup need to be tested and they are only part of ztk 1.0 zopeapp.cfg, but now I had second look into versions.cfg of zope and plone and I am seein

[Zope-dev] ZTK 1.0 lifetime

2012-05-22 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote: > Well, the question is, is there still a need for ztk 1.0 tests? If so, > who are the consumers and for how long should we run the tests for > 1.0? Zope 2.13 is based on the ZTK 1.0. There's no version of Zope 2 that uses ZTK 1.1 and a poten

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 5, OK: 37, UNKNOWN: 1

2012-05-22 Thread Patrick Gerken
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote: > [1]    UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux >       https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063362.html Bug in test code, looks like a refactoring went bad. Error in test test_EnsureProtec