This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2012-06-04 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-06-05 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/
On 06/05/2012 06:36 AM, Uli Fouquet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:53:19 -0400 Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>> On 06/05/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
>>> Am 04.06.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Uli Fouquet: […]
Also updated the 0.6 branch in SVN. Hope that's okay.
>>>
>>>
>>> I think
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I (and many people I know) find the interactive feature of
> zdaemon annoying. I'd like to drop it, both to reduce annoyance
> and to reduce the amount of code to maintain.
I've never found this a useful feature.
+1
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
I (and many people I know) find the interactive feature of
zdaemon annoying. I'd like to drop it, both to reduce annoyance
and to reduce the amount of code to maintain.
Any objections?
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://www.dublinstore.com
Am 05.06.2012 um 09:53 schrieb Tres Seaver:
> On 06/05/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
>> Am 04.06.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Uli Fouquet: […]
>>> Also updated the 0.6 branch in SVN. Hope that's okay.
>>
>>
>> I think there should not be a 0.6 branch as the trunk is still on
>> 0.6.*. Usually we
Hi there,
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:53:19 -0400 Tres Seaver wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
>> Am 04.06.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Uli Fouquet: […]
>>> Also updated the 0.6 branch in SVN. Hope that's okay.
>>
>>
>> I think there should not be a 0.6 branch as the trunk is still on
>
On 06/05/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 04.06.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Uli Fouquet: […]
>> Also updated the 0.6 branch in SVN. Hope that's okay.
>
>
> I think there should not be a 0.6 branch as the trunk is still on
> 0.6.*. Usually we only create maintenance branches for non-current
> r
Am 05.06.2012 um 03:00 schrieb Zope tests summarizer:
[…]
> Non-OK results
> --
>
> [1]FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-June/063929.html
> [2]FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
> https://mail.zo
Am 04.06.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Uli Fouquet:
[…]
> Also updated the 0.6 branch in SVN. Hope that's okay.
I think there should not be a 0.6 branch as the trunk is still on 0.6.*.
Usually we only create maintenance branches for non-current releases.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
--
Michael Howitz · m..
