Am 17.12.2007 um 16:34 schrieb Fred Drake:
On Dec 17, 2007 10:32 AM, Janko Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh that would be a new information for me, so I would be very
interested, where this is implemented.
z3c.baseregistry
Uhu, thanks, this looks like it will open u
Am 17.12.2007 um 16:16 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Janko Hauser wrote:
...
This baffles me somewhat. At the moment I see skins/layers as the
only mechanism to let developers using an application to customize
it, possibly more than once in the same instance. I find
and also different subset of functionality.
With regards,
__Janko
--
Janko Hauser email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mobile: +49 1721 641552
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
htt
these things together. One point I do not understand is, how to
build eggs from src checkouts in one buildout for zope2 without
downloading all dependencies as eggs (which are also part of the main
zope install)
Is there actually a list, where buildout questions can be asked?
With
Replying to my own post,
Am 03.02.2007 um 15:14 schrieb Janko Hauser:
There are hardly "new", though, they've been around for ages and
have enthusiastic users. Those users always found it hard to
convince people to adopt them more widely because they were not in
the standa
uld look like and collectively
review that.
Another point is that for example hurry is already using parts of the
code. So there are possibilities to look for integration in zope3 too.
With regards,
__Janko
--
Janko Hauser email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mobile: +49 1721 641552
Am 17.06.2005 um 11:45 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Hi there,
Since Zope 2.8 has now been released, we can start talking about
what would be in Zope 2.9. I have some ideas:
* newer version of Five included (whatever version is current then)
* Zope 3.1 included
* Python 2.4 support
+1 althou
Martijn Faassen wrote:
There's the 'approach' and the implementation. The approach is fairly
clear: a focus on baby steps to integrate into Zope 2.7. The aim is to
introduce as much as possible as make sense of Zope 3 facilities into
Zope 2.
Besides ourself also Christian Heimes has done a more
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:59:22 +0800
"Bjorn Stabell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Setting Last-Modified to the current time isn't always the right
> thing; some objects, .e.g., Files, Images, Documents, have last
> modification times, and using those would be better. Not sure if
> the accelerato
On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 23:02, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
> i personally don't see a way to completely avoid ZODB bloat with a
> counter product stored in the ZODB itself. IMHO it is inherently bad to
> use ZODB-based hit counters in general for that very reason.
>
Just an idea from the 'could-be-d
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> From: "Geir Bækholt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>i can confirm that this is a bug in DateTime.rfc822(), and that
>>rfc-conformant mailclients choke on it aswell..
>
>
> Oh, man, I've looked at DateTime now, and it's a mess... (ar at least, the
> timeone hadnling is). I'm s
other actions?
We would like to have this incorporated. Please take this mail as a
commitment notification :-).
Thanks for any answers,
with regards,
__Janko Hauser
--
i.A. Dr. Janko Hauser
Software Engineering
c o m . u n i t G m b H
online-schmiede seit 1994
http://www.comunit.
12 matches
Mail list logo
