ed about indexes beyond this point - they're all
returning results in less than a millisecond.
> Can you provide information on the corpus / configuration / test plan
> you used to generate these results?
It's basically a Plone site with 300,000 remember based users and
roughly 150,0
e_or_created. I have
previously done benchmarks with query plan and it didn't make any
noticeable difference.
What might be true or is becoming more likely is that indexes are used
where they don't fit the use case rather than that the indexes
themselves need optimisation.
--
Roché Compa
GroupId |ZCTextIndex |0.105|94962.39
getUserId|ZCTextIndex |0.105|95165.88
getFullname |ZCTextIndex |0.104|95313.06
getRoles |FieldIndex |0.104|95385.31
getUserName |ZCTextIndex |0.103|
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:41 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:32 , Roché Compaan wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> >> When it comes to integrating a
h have a
cache of 20 objects. Our queries are CPU bound, not memory or IO bound.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-d
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 13:23 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Oct 27, 2008, at 13:08 , Roché Compaan wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> >> - Plone uses too many indexes, and
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Roché Compaan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:20 +0200, Hedley Roos wrote:
> >>> Have you measures the time needs for some "standard" ZCatalog q
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:50 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 26.10.2008 18:43 Uhr, Roché Compaan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:20 +0200, Hedley Roos wrote:
>
> >
> > I suspect specific indexes are just performing suboptimally and needs to
> > be improved. Extend
Hi Fabio
The funkload tests were project specific. I plan to write up my findings
and to do benchmarks on a standard Plone instance and blog about it.
This will unfortunately have to wait since I'm on holiday this week :-)
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems
cache the IISet result sets.
I suspect specific indexes are just performing suboptimally and needs to
be improved. ExtendPathIndex in Plone seems to be one of them.
The effect on performance is really awesome, now we just need to fine
tune the implementation.
--
Roc
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:44 -0700, Ross Patterson wrote:
> Roché Compaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Where can one find Zope 3 catalog? Or is it simply zope.index?
>
> I think zope.app.catalog is what you're looking for.
Thanks. I was looking at the Zope 3
Where can one find Zope 3 catalog? Or is it simply zope.index?
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 20:01 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Roché Compaan wrote at 2007-9-18 08:55 +0200:
> > ...
> >Sorry if I was unclear but what I'm really asking is if it is possible
> >to improve the conflict handling of the current indexes that we have in
&g
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 19:57 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Roché Compaan wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > Are the current indexing solutions that we have in Zope 2 and 3 the best
> > that we can have? Is th
ally would like to make the ZODB work
for me here.
Are there solutions here? Can one employ some of the QueueCatalog
conflict resolution strategies to make indexes more resilient? Or should
one use some locking strategy instead?
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems
raise Unauthorized(name)
If you agree that his is a bug, I'll log it.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zo
r. Maybe this is more than enough, I
don't know, but with apps like Plone that relies heavily on the catalog,
optimisation of catalog operations can surely help improving
scalability.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 09:48 +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Roché Compaan wrote at 2007-2-23 22:00 +0200:
> > ...
> >Thanks for that pointer. It's good that way, it should make invalidation
> >easier. It could be as simple as invalidating any cached result that
> &
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 20:43 +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Roché Compaan wrote at 2007-2-23 18:44 +0200:
> > ...
> >Cool idea. I haven't done any coding involving OFS.Cache though. Looking
> >at it briefly it looks like one can modify the catalog to subclass
> &g
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 12:09 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Roché Compaan wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 06:55 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
> >>>> Roché Compaan wrote:
> >&
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 06:55 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Roché Compaan wrote:
> > I'm curious, has anybody played around with the idea of caching ZCatalog
> > results and if I submitted a patch to do this would it be excepted?
> >
> > I quickly coded some basic
ith a Plone site that is a heavy user of the catalog)
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML enc
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 14:56 +, Chris Withers wrote:
> Roché Compaan wrote:
> > +obj = self.aq_parent.unrestrictedTraverse(self.getPath(), None)
> > +if obj and securityManager.validate(obj, obj, None, None):
> > +return obj
> > +el
found. But, it won't work because restrictedTraverse already
fails when traversing the 'documents' folder.
I would propose that getObject does an unrestrictedTraverse of the path
and then checks if the user has permission to access that the object.
--
Roché Compaan
U
without bugging the list too
> much?
I don't think there are any comprehensive documentation about writing
DA's but '_v_' attributes are *volatile* attributes and they are not
persisted, see http://zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/VolatileAttributes.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:50:56 -0400
Casey Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 30 September 2002 08:36 am, Roché Compaan wrote:
> > Don't know if this will help but these errors specifically occur with
> > 'lines' properties with Keyword Indexes on the
feel right. I would have thought that only unique values
should be stored in the index data.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:17:17 +0200
Jean Jordaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Our app has b
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 18:31, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 11:45, Roché Compaan wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >
>
> This is not a valid syntax, you should have::
>
>
>
> Note the double quotes around the getProxies call. In orde
hat makes it impossible for the subsequent tag to
find the "getProxies" method in the root.
Any ideas why?
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
> ;-)
It very nice to hear that I can simply upgrade and my problem will go away :)
And it did! Just thought I'd mention this since I didn't find anything
in the collector about it.
--
Roché Compaan
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
7;complex':
, 'EOFError': , 'min': , 'reorder': , 'OSError': ,
'same_type': , 'RuntimeError': , 'LookupError': , 'apply': , 'EnvironmentError': , 'unicode': , 'ValueError':
I have a ZPatterns application that uses the ZODB as storage. When I delete
an object only the name of the script that deleted the object is shown in
the Undo log. Is there any way to determine the ID of the object that was
deleted? Is there a way that one can get a handle on the object that wa
32 matches
Mail list logo
