Re: [Zope-dev] List of packages in ZTK

2009-07-05 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
Hi, On 05.07.2009, at 07:06, Lennart Regebro wrote: 2009/7/5 Stephan Richter srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu: To be honest, I am very disappointed by this list. It is totally meaningless to me since it does not represent any list with which I can build even a fairly simple application

Re: [Zope-dev] A suggestion for changing exception handler when loading 'c' optimisations to make modules more friendly for GAE

2009-07-03 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
Hi, yes, I'd really appreciate such a modification. Then I could delete the regarding code in my rod.recipe.appengine, which provides a dummy implementation of imp.load_dynamic. Tim, do you have a list of the concerning packages? I could help making these changes. A good reason to file an

Re: [Zope-dev] A suggestion for changing exception handler when loading 'c' optimisations to make modules more friendly for GAE

2009-07-03 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
On 03.07.2009, at 10:38, Chris Withers wrote: Tim Hoffman wrote: gae/1.333250465889549129/zope/i18nmessageid/ _zope_i18nmessageid_message.py, line 6, in __bootstrap__ imp.load_dynamic(__name__,__file__) File /base/python_dist/lib/python2.5/py_imp.py, line 116, in load_dynamic

Re: [Zope-dev] A suggestion for changing exception handler when loading 'c' optimisations to make modules more friendly for GAE

2009-07-03 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
On 03.07.2009, at 12:33, Jim Fulton wrote: On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote: Hi Jim That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone upates (via buildout etc a) module they need to remember to remove the recreated file before redeploying the app,

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.12.0a2 released

2009-04-19 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
On 19.04.2009, at 10:52, Andreas Jung wrote: I just released Zope 2.12.0a2: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Zope2/2.12.0a2 doc/CHANGES.rst is missing in the source distribution on pypi: Getting distribution for 'Zope2'. error: doc/CHANGES.rst: No such file or directory An error occured when

[Zope-dev] several zope.* libs within gae (was ZCML implementations: where should they go)

2009-04-09 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
Hi, Shane Hathaway wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: I'ld rather not see a whole slew of extra packagse appear. I also wonder how the extra number of packages and increasing size of sys.path influence performance and restrictions on environments like GAE. For

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-27 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
Hi, had the same issue tonight. I'm using attached versions.cfg for now. That works quite well for me. Cheers, Tobias [buildout] versions = versions [versions] Acquisition = 2.12.0a1 DateTime = 2.11.2 ExtensionClass = 2.11.1 Persistence = 2.11.1 tempstorage = 2.11.1 zLOG = 2.11.1 ClientForm

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-27 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
On 28.03.2009, at 00:30, Chris Withers wrote: Tobias Rodäbel wrote: Hi, had the same issue tonight. I'm using attached versions.cfg for now. That works quite well for me. Which issue is this supposed to help with? Using zc.buildout. This is my buildut.cfg: [buildout] parts = zope zopepy

Re: [Zope-dev] trying out the buildout-based Zope 2.12...

2009-03-27 Thread Tobias Rodäbel
On 28.03.2009, at 00:36, Chris Withers wrote: There are currently two seperate issue with specifying zope2 as an egg in a buildout.cfg. Which of these two issues is your solution designed to address? My versions.cfg resolved all version conflicts mentioned within this thread.