Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously whit wrote:
2 items:
1. how does everyone feel about adding the following boilerplate to
all occurences of Products/__init__.py to enable the easy creation of
Product eggs?
Aren't we asking people to move to using python
on your path to the test search path. I
consider this a defect in the current test runner that makes working
with eggs and 2.9 or 2.10 rather cumbersome. could we consider adding
this or some other solution to this problem?
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2276
-w
--
-- d. whit
works right now with existing z2 catalogs.
-w
--
-- d. whit morriss --
- senior engineer, opencore -
- http://www.openplans.org -
- m: 415-710-8975 -
If you don't know where you are,
you don't know anything at all
Dr. Edgar Spencer, Ph.D., 1995
--
-- d. whit morriss --
- senior engineer, opencore -
- http://www.openplans.org -
- m: 415-710-8975 -
If you don't know where you are,
you don't know anything at all
Dr. Edgar Spencer, Ph.D., 1995
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev
Jim Fulton wrote:
whit wrote:
I'm not clear on what the advantage would be. I'm probably missing
some use cases. I think they are both valid approaches to the problem.
my main usecase is to be able to use buildouts in a workingenv without
having to rewrite the recipes... right now, I have
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
whit wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
This is awesome, and by that I don't mean the fact that we have a
plone buildout, but that we actually have Zope 2 recipes for
buildout. I hope they can be moved to svn.zope.org for further
I just made ZopeTestCase defer all loading until it's layer(essentially
deferring the import of ZopeLite which is sort of a subpar way to handle
things and using a registry to handle installProducts). most of what
happens in zopelite itself should be the layer(rather than carefully
isolating
-use them in other contexts. However most components of
Zope 2 are heavily dependent on others.
Yes, that's true. But eggs don't necessarily have to have few
dependencies ;). Eggs just have well-defined dependencies. And like Whit
said, there might be a desire to have certain Zope 2 components have
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
snip /
I don't think all of these things should go into the Products.Five
anymore, for several reasons:
* We're trying to get away from writing products and into writing Python
packages that can e.g. be installed as eggs.
* Some of these things are not
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 30. Oktober 2006 00:01:33 +0100 Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* It is unclear to me at this point what Zope 2's egg story will be. I
*hope* that 2.11 will get the same egg story as the Zope 3.4 that ships
with it does, though noone has talked
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:49:14AM -0500, whit wrote:
| http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2206 is resolved for *nix
| flavors(sorry for double posting, completely forgot I had posted the bug
| before). I have no access to a win box so someone else will need do
on windows).
-w
whit wrote:
silence == consent. will proceed as declared.
-w
whit wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 06:26:49PM -0500, whit wrote:
It seems like if you've set your PYTHONPATH and start zope, you
would expect that path to be available.
Indeed.
Anyone object
silence == consent. will proceed as declared.
-w
whit wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 06:26:49PM -0500, whit wrote:
It seems like if you've set your PYTHONPATH and start zope, you would
expect that path to be available.
Indeed.
Anyone object to this going forward
thanks guys...know this one was a long time in the coming.
-w
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi all,
on behalf of Zope developer community I am pleased to announce the
release of Zope 2.10.0.
You can download Zope 2.10.0 from:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.0/
Some new features of Zope
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 06:26:49PM -0500, whit wrote:
It seems like if you've set your PYTHONPATH and start zope, you would
expect that path to be available.
Indeed.
Anyone object to this going forward? Anyone think this is a bug that
should be fixed(on older versions
if zclasses(and some of the niceties that depended on them like
ZPatterns) could reliably roundtrip to the filesystem, would we be
having this conversation?
I don't know...it seems like if you tackled the less sexy problem of
making zclasses play with normal developer tool chain, the divide
ZClasses don't get better from writing long postings.
Ah, yes but I can write much faster than I can code. What am I doing
on this list!?! All I have to do is to motivate someone else to do the
work!
programmers are generally motivated by concrete contributions ie money,
code, beer, or
I've been working with workingenv.py and zope a bit. It offers a very
nice fashion of working with zope(constrains python and setuptools to
operating in a restricted environment).
there are some lumps.
you have to call the --home flag when creating the environment. I
haven't successful made
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Looks like INSTANCE_HOME/lib/python is added to PYTHONPATH at some
point during startup, but not on the zopectl/runzope scripts.
I've tried installing eggs into INSTANCE_HOME/lib/python and they
won't load unless it's added to PYTHONPATH at startup time.
Thus, I propose
don't seem to
help). Running the tests via python setup.py test only works when I
unflag the testing dependency of zope.testing.
anyone been down this rabbit hole? have any suggestions? resources?
-w
--
| david whit morriss
|
| contact :: http://public.xdi.org/=whit
If you don't know
there is a world of difference between shipping with and requiring...is
this language really what happened?
I thought the decision was to ship with a site.zcml and
package-includes directory in their conventional place, not changing
Five's behavior to look for it's skeleton if it didn't find
21 matches
Mail list logo
