[Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

Hi, I'd just like to know when can we expect a 2.6.1b2. It would be nice to have a new release where we don't have to patch just to get ZClasses to work. -- Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like solitary confinement. ___ Zo

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

Hi, I'd just like to know when can we expect a 2.6.1b2. It would be nice to have a new release where we don't have to patch just to get ZClasses to work. Yes, it IS indeed a problem if there is no single Zope version out there that can be used without patches. 2.6.0 has the DateTime bug, the 2

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

--On Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2003 20:31 +0100 Joachim Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'd just like to know when can we expect a 2.6.1b2. It would be nice to have a new release where we don't have to patch just to get ZClasses to work. Yes, it IS indeed a problem if there is no single Z

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

> > I'd just like to know when can we expect a 2.6.1b2. It would be nice to > > have a new release where we don't have to patch just to get ZClasses to > > work. > > Yes, it IS indeed a problem if there is no single Zope version out there > that can be used without patches. 2.6.0 has the DateTime

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

Guido van Rossum wrote: If only it were that easy. Everybody wants "no new features" except for the one feature they desperately want to have without upgrading to the next feature release. :-( Still, we're back to the situation where it's been weeks since the last release, and there's nothing

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

> Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > > If only it were that easy. Everybody wants "no new features" except > > for the one feature they desperately want to have without upgrading to > > the next feature release. :-( > > Still, we're back to the situation where it's been weeks since the > last release

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

On Saturday 25 January 2003 1:07 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > If only it were that easy. Everybody wants "no new features" except > > > for the one feature they desperately want to have without upgrading to > > > the next feature release. :-( > > > > Still, we're b

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 07:40, Toby Dickenson wrote: > On Saturday 25 January 2003 1:07 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Is there an estimate for this? > > afaict, the public schedule since December has been that this is imminent any > day now. I have some important bug fixes that I would like to i

RE: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

> > afaict, the public schedule since December has been that this > is imminent any > > day now. I have some important bug fixes that I would like to > include in > > 2.6.1, and I would like some assurance that beta 2 will not be released > > mid-merge. > > I don't think b2 will be release without

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

Here's the status - an engagement that we're doing has been bringing up some issues regarding ZODB and ZEO in large-scale environments. I think that the fixes are useful enough that they should be in 2.6.1, but getting them "finalized" has taken longer than I expected. I'd love to know what kin

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

I updated the Zope 2.6 project page to reflect this, figuring that it should at least be *somewhere* on the web :). It's nothing fancy, I just included the note and took out some of the older Status notes that reflected the developm

RE: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

> > Here's the status - an engagement that we're doing has been bringing > > up some issues regarding ZODB and ZEO in large-scale environments. I > > think that the fixes are useful enough that they should be in 2.6.1, > > but getting them "finalized" has taken longer than I expected. > > I'd love

RE: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

> "BL" == Brian Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Here's the status - an engagement that we're doing has been >> > bringing up some issues regarding ZODB and ZEO in large-scale >> > environments. I think that the fixes are useful enough that >> > they should be in 2.6.1, but getti