Hi!
Christian Theune wrote:
> On 04/09/2010 05:31 PM, yuppie wrote:
>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> yuppie wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
So depending on a layout difference (line break or not) it produces
copyright headers with different content.
Doesn't make any sense to me, but t
On 04/09/2010 05:31 PM, yuppie wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> yuppie wrote:
>>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> So depending on a layout difference (line break or not) it produces
>>> copyright headers with different content.
>>>
>>> Doesn't make any sense to me, but the people I already asked don
Hi there,
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> I've seen lots of checkins recently stating "Comply with repository policy".
>
> I haven't seen any announcement of a new official repository policy.
> Have I missed it?
Tres explained that very well, I think. I also did some
comply-with-repos-policy checkin
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
> yuppie wrote:
>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> So depending on a layout difference (line break or not) it produces
>> copyright headers with different content.
>>
>> Doesn't make any sense to me, but the people I already asked don't care.
>
> The "All Rights Reserved" is a little
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yuppie wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> o Run the automated fixups::
>>
>> $ /path/to/zrp/bin/zope-org-fix-project .
>> ... ...
>
> Just in case *someone* cares:
>
> zope-org-fix-project was written for copyright headers wi
On 04/09/2010 12:36 PM, yuppie wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> o Run the automated fixups::
>>
>>$ /path/to/zrp/bin/zope-org-fix-project .
>>... ...
>
> Just in case *someone* cares:
>
> zope-org-fix-project was written for copyright headers with a specific
> layout.
Hi!
Tres Seaver wrote:
> o Run the automated fixups::
>
> $ /path/to/zrp/bin/zope-org-fix-project .
> ... ...
Just in case *someone* cares:
zope-org-fix-project was written for copyright headers with a specific
layout. Depending on the actual layout it removes the sentence "Al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> I've seen lots of checkins recently stating "Comply with repository policy".
>
> I haven't seen any announcement of a new official repository policy.
> Have I missed it?
>
> I'd be especially interested who exactly is resp
Hi.
I've seen lots of checkins recently stating "Comply with repository policy".
I haven't seen any announcement of a new official repository policy.
Have I missed it?
I'd be especially interested who exactly is responsible for changing
code so that it complies with the new policy. How much of t
