We're close to finishing a new version of ZEO, which will be released
as part of the next ZODB3 release (formerly StandaloneZODB).
I think this would be a good opportunity to make ZEO a standard part
of Zope, starting with Zope 2.7.
Advantage for users: if you download Zope, you have everything
From: Guido van Rossum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Zope-dev] Integrating ZEO with Zope 2.7
We're close to finishing a new version of ZEO, which will be released
as part of the next ZODB3 release (formerly StandaloneZ
ght
take a while to catch up.
--
Andy McKay
www.agmweb.ca
- Original Message -
From: "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:26 AM
Subject: [Zope-dev] Integrating ZEO with Zope 2.7
> We're close
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 8:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +1
+1
> IMHO, Zope releases should, in this scenario, be configured by default to
> use a custom_zodb.py file with ClientStorage over a socket at startup,
That is a tempting idea.
Use of a TCP socket has security implications that ma
t: Re: [Zope-dev] Integrating ZEO with Zope 2.7
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 8:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +1
+1
> IMHO, Zope releases should, in this scenario, be configured by default to
> use a custom_zodb.py file with ClientStorage over a socket at startup,
That is a tempting idea.
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 16:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +1
+1 for me too
>
> IMHO, Zope releases should, in this scenario, be configured by default to
> use a custom_zodb.py file with ClientStorage over a socket at startup,
> making the default config of Zope one that uses ZEO.
I'm not sure ab
On Wednesday 02 Oct 2002 8:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmm... My thought: on Win32, bind the TCP port to the loopback address.
> Since Win32 in _most_ cases is not a multi-user system, this would have the
> general effect of keeping this from being an issue (unless you ran terminal
> servic
> > IMHO, Zope releases should, in this scenario, be configured by default to
> > use a custom_zodb.py file with ClientStorage over a socket at startup,
>
> That is a tempting idea.
>
> Use of a TCP socket has security implications that make it a bad
> choice for a default, unless we implement m
> Great idea, but this could also be a chance to fix the windows z2.py
> thang and the installer ;)
Maybe, but I have no expertise in this area.
> As long as standalone Zope without ZEO would still be a startup
> option, Im sure there are more things out there like the Plone
> Controller that mi
> IMHO, Zope releases should, in this scenario, be configured by default to
> use a custom_zodb.py file with ClientStorage over a socket at startup,
> making the default config of Zope one that uses ZEO. Also, start scripts
> should be distributed with options to support both the following:
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
