Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, yeah, thats true, it would be possible to have both, even though they
> aim to solve the same problem.
> Wouldn't it be a bit confusing to have both? Too may different ways of
> giving a person a role.
The use cases are somewhat different though.
From: "Florent Guillaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Then it's simply :-) a matter of user interface. There's also the
> question of what permissions are needed to modify a workgroup of course.
>
> Does this match what you want ?
Yeah, I think so.
> Looks quite feasible to me, and I think it can be d
Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With workgroups you create ten workgroups. Within each workgrup you assign
> users to their respective roles. You then add the workgroups to the correct
> places in the hierarchy. It also opens for the possibility to assign
> workgroup managers that can
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 07:01:13PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> From: "Jim Penny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I now have two kinds of administrators, and two kinds of users.
>
> An interesting case. If I understand it correctly, with our workgroups
> scheme,the restricted administrators would h
From: "Florent Guillaume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No no no ! With NUG the Roles added to a group are still added at the
> local role level, which means that the 'bosses' group only has a Boss
> role where you want it.
Yes, of course. But what I was aiming at is that all the Bosses have Boss
right a
I'm trying to wrap my mind around what you call workgroups.
By the way, have you reviewed the use cases for workgroups that I put in
http://www.zope.org/Members/nuxeo/Products/NuxUserGroups/README.txt ?
Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> With normal grouping, you typically have on
From: "Jim Penny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I now have two kinds of administrators, and two kinds of users.
An interesting case. If I understand it correctly, with our workgroups
scheme,the restricted administrators would have administration rights on a
workgroup. They would then be able to create u
Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I needed a generalization of this scheme (and so ended up writing my own
> User Folder).
>
> We manufacture parts which are controlled by second parties, but bought
> primarily by third parties. I will call these parties Manufacturer,
> Brand Owners
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:11:05PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> I also want groups! But I want a different kind of groups, that I call
> "workgroups" just to distinguish them from all other types of "groups". :-)
> I don't know if it's possible implement this compatibly in 2.x, and I can't
> ju
I also want groups! But I want a different kind of groups, that I call
"workgroups" just to distinguish them from all other types of "groups". :-)
I don't know if it's possible implement this compatibly in 2.x, and I can't
judge if there is any problems in implementing one type of groups in 2.x an
The design will carefull take into account backward compatibility. You
can still have a user folder that doesn't know about groups, in which
case the users won't have groups associated to them. No problem.
The design goes like that: the local role machinery is patched to take
into account groups
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> Okay, I'm a bit late but I'd like to integrate what's currently in
> NuxUserGroups, a bit updated maybe.
>
> http://www.zope.org/Members/nuxeo/Products/NuxUserGroups
>
> There will be a merge conflit with Lennart's Local roles blacklists,
> it it's chosen for 2.6, but
> I think that this needs to happen Real Soon. I propose that
> this friday (the 15th) is the deadline for adding/volunteering
> for the 2.6 plan.
Okay, I'm a bit late but I'd like to integrate what's currently in
NuxUserGroups, a bit updated maybe.
http://www.zope.org/Members/nuxeo/Products/Nux
Hi all -
> 1) If the projects for which I have volunteered are accepted as a goal for
> Zope 2.6 then I have some work cut out for me, and I'd like to try to
> schedule the necessary time intelligently and early. Any ideas
> on when the
> "grocery list" will be evaluated?
I think that this need
14 matches
Mail list logo
