From: Joachim Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OrderedFolder is not about having an ordered default view in the
management
interface.
I know that. Still, you do get an ordered default view with OrderedFolder
(unless something changed very recently).
___
Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also do we want all folders to be ordered by default ?
I wouldn't want this. I don't know how ordered folder works nowadays, but I
want it sorted on name by default.
Standard Folders are *explicitly* sorted by name by default, so the fact
that the
From: Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standard Folders are *explicitly* sorted by name by default, so the fact
that the underlying objectValues() returns ordered objects is of no
consequence here.
So the UI is sorted by default, but objectValues is ordered? Perfect!
Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with both of these two points that Jeffrey made. It is a sore
omission from the core, but I cant see any place to hook the user
interface that doesnt amount to bloat for many folders that dont
need.
Does it make sense to include an
From: Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also do we want all folders to be ordered by default ?
I wouldn't want this. I don't know how ordered folder works nowadays, but I
want it sorted on name by default.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL
, 2002 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Ordered Folder (was: Speaking of 2.6...)
From: Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also do we want all folders to be ordered by default ?
I wouldn't want this. I don't know how ordered folder works nowadays, but
I
want it sorted on name by default
