Re: [Zope-dev] Progress on zope intid/keyreference.

2009-02-01 Thread Dan Korostelev
2009/2/1 Christian Theune : > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:10:00 +0300 > Dan Korostelev wrote: > >> I also just checked in a hack to make old keyreference objects >> loadable if zope.app.keyreference is gone because a buildout doesn't >> depend on it after upgrade: >> >> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/ch

Re: [Zope-dev] Progress on zope intid/keyreference.

2009-02-01 Thread Christian Theune
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:10:00 +0300 Dan Korostelev wrote: > I also just checked in a hack to make old keyreference objects > loadable if zope.app.keyreference is gone because a buildout doesn't > depend on it after upgrade: > > http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/checkins/2009-January/029890.html > >

Re: [Zope-dev] Progress on zope intid/keyreference.

2009-01-31 Thread Dan Korostelev
I also just checked in a hack to make old keyreference objects loadable if zope.app.keyreference is gone because a buildout doesn't depend on it after upgrade: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/checkins/2009-January/029890.html I wonder if that kind of quick hack is okay to be released for the renam

[Zope-dev] Progress on zope intid/keyreference.

2009-01-31 Thread Dan Korostelev
I just finished working on zope's intid and keyreference packages. The whole key-reference stuff is now moved in zope.keyreference package and the new version of zope.app.keyreference is released that only contains compatibility imports, so it makes no sense to depend on zope.app.keyreference anym