Andreas Jung wrote:
> On 27.10.2008 18:55 Uhr, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Jung<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Why do we need these backports on the current maintenance branches?
>>
>> They are small cleanups that could potentially allow someone to run
>> Pyth
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>> Would anyone be against this?
>> I find this pretty disturbing as it implies you *would* be running Zope
>> 2.10 on Python 2.5 or 2.6 without fixing RestrictedPython.
>
> RestrictedPython is its own package.
...which python scripts and page templates rely on heavilly
Chris Withers wrote:
> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
>> I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for
>> Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10.
>> I would *not* backport changes to RestrictedPython because
>> those are actually features (support for newer versions of Python)
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for
> Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10. The fixes that would
> be backported would only be those that deal with syntax changes (eg:
> 'with' and 'as' keyword being used as variables, relative impor
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please create branches first and then lets review the changes.
Great.
> What is the
> state of the compatability of Z3 modules with Python 2.5/2.6 as used in Zope
> 2.10/2.11?
Hard to tell at this point.
--
Sidnei da Si
On 27.10.2008 18:55 Uhr, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Jung<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why do we need these backports on the current maintenance branches?
They are small cleanups that could potentially allow someone to run
Python 2.5 or 2.6 if they really real
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do we need these backports on the current maintenance branches?
They are small cleanups that could potentially allow someone to run
Python 2.5 or 2.6 if they really really really wanted to, but note
should be made that
Hi all,
I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for
Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10. The fixes that would
be backported would only be those that deal with syntax changes (eg:
'with' and 'as' keyword being used as variables, relative imports) and
some C-level c
On 27.10.2008 18:36 Uhr, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose backporting some of the fixes needed for
Python 2.5 and 2.6 all the way down to Zope 2.10. The fixes that would
be backported would only be those that deal with syntax changes (eg:
'with' and 'as' keyword being used
