Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-21 Thread Jim Fulton
Martijn Faassen wrote: alan runyan wrote: Alan, does that address your concerns? Just understand that the Five approach is still being developed, so there's nothing to "adopt" yet. :) But I certainly encourage folks to participate and help Martijn figure out what the approach should be. Raphael,

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-18 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jim Fulton wrote: Can we please stop using this name in writing? It is funny, but not very reassuring to outsiders. :) What do we call this project then? :) The Project-that-shall-not-be-named! Regards, Martijn ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-17 Thread Martijn Faassen
alan runyan wrote: Alan, does that address your concerns? Just understand that the Five approach is still being developed, so there's nothing to "adopt" yet. :) But I certainly encourage folks to participate and help Martijn figure out what the approach should be. Raphael, I think its great that

[Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-15 Thread Jim Fulton
alan runyan wrote: Alan, does that address your concerns? ... One of the big questions that I believe is open is how to use more of zope.app in Zope 2 - specifically Schema/Widgets. I heard that Zope Corp. is using this in some projects. I think we should not be squeemish about using zope.app. Wi

[Zope-dev] Re: [Plone-developers] Re: Five and 2.9

2004-06-15 Thread alan runyan
>> Alan, does that address your concerns? > > Just understand that the Five approach is still being developed, so > there's nothing to "adopt" yet. :) But I certainly encourage folks to > participate and help Martijn figure out what the approach should be. Raphael, I think its great that Jim resp